Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ROTB; Gilbo_3; Kartographer; NFHale; hiredhand; 95B30; Clump; OneWingedShark; mkjessup

“However, you’re forgetting that the last thing Russia/China will want/allow is a country where the conservative majority is in complete control. They will nuke us during the chaos. You and the 90 million can definitely take the country back. The issue is, external attack, during the transition.”

China has no reason to attack us. They would be cutting off their nose to spite their face. I have lived in Asia, and done business with the Chinese. They have no such intentions. What would be their motive?

Do you think the military would not use nukes to defend against an agression by China or Russia? Do you think they would defer to a wannabe, third rate fascist dictator(OBAMA) whom they now know despises the country he is leading? Do you think that in this day and age, the military, CIA, et al, has no contingency plan if, at some moment, the POTUS goes “bonkers” ?

I am no expert in biblical exegesis, but do you believe God would wnt us to be ruled by Godless, evil, murderous men? Find me a passage that would indicate same.

This is a great thread, by the way.


86 posted on 04/16/2010 4:55:26 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops....and vote out the RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: stephenjohnbanker
always a great thread indeed when we hafta get out books and look stuff up...ive got my 'word for the day' now...

good point on the chicoms, unless they dont wanna get the bennies of the collateral securing their loans, why radiate the place from sea to shining sea ???

if they will simply nuke the cities, well, ahem, theyd be close to doing us a favor wouldnt they ???

87 posted on 04/16/2010 5:08:38 AM PDT by Gilbo_3 (Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force.Like fire,a dangerous servant & master. George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

To: stephenjohnbanker
China has no reason to attack us. They would be cutting off their nose to spite their face. I have lived in Asia, and done business with the Chinese. They have no such intentions. What would be their motive?

The same motive as the Japanese had in late 1941, the ChiComs would nuke us in an instant if they thought they could eliminate most of our nuclear retaliatory capability and then hold our cities hostage. The way it works:

Beijing launches surprise nuclear strike (perhaps in tandem with the Russians) on U.S. strategic assets, i.e., missile silos, airfields, naval bases (specifically Trident sub bases), and then follow up with a demand for unconditional surrender, which if complied with, will spare U.S. cities from nuclear attack. The threat is clear: retaliate instead of surrender and your population will be vaporized just like your now smoldering military assets. So now to answer the question "what would Communist China gain"? They gain complete hegemony over all of the Pacific, from Japan and points north, all the way down to Australia and the arctic polar region. They sweep the board while taking little if any serious damage. If such a hypothetical attack were jointly planned and executed with the Russians, the pay off for Moscow would be to reassert their power in Europe, use the threat of tactical nukes to bring their former satellites back into the fold, and without the U.S. backing up NATO, most if not all of Europe would fold up like a cheap suit inside of 30 days, as I see it.

Do you think the military would not use nukes to defend against an aggression by China or Russia? Do you think they would defer to a wannabe, third rate fascist dictator (OBAMA) whom they now know despises the country he is leading? Do you think that in this day and age, the military, CIA, et al, has no contingency plan if, at some moment, the POTUS goes “bonkers” ?

Those are excellent questions. While I have no actual knowledge of any hypothetical plans by either the military and/or the CIA to seize control of the Executive Branch, it doesn't mean that it wouldn't be possible to do so.

To explore this a bit: if, in the early moments of an incoming nuclear attack it appeared that the President (any President) was essentially refusing to defend the Nation, the simplest solution is probably the one which would be employed: somebody will just shoot the sonuvabitch right between the eyes and assume command and control of the presidential nuclear codes (aka 'the football'), any questions raised about what happened to the Chief Executive will be written off with "he didn't survive the attack".

WITH the nuclear codes, retaliation would be delayed perhaps, but still implemented. WITHOUT the codes, it becomes more unpredictable due to the institutional use of PALs throughout the nuclear inventory (PAL = Permissive Action Links), which make it impossible to arm and detonate a nuclear device without express presidential authority. There has always been speculation as to whether or not SSBN Captains (missile sub commanders) have the authority to act independently if communications between their boat and Washington are disrupted. I suspect there is actually no such mechanism for operating outside of the Navy's TCCD (Trident Coded Control Device) just another name for 'PAL', TCCD has been in place since 1997.

PALs are more than just a little add-on box to a nuclear warhead, they act not only as a lock on the use of the weapon but are capable of disabling the weapon if tampered with (certain versions, unsure if that feature was fully implemented). Nuclear physicist Dr. Peter Zimmerman once quoted a weapons designer as saying that "bypassing a PAL is about as complex as performing a tonsillectomy while entering the patient from the wrong end."

I am no expert in biblical exegesis, but do you believe God would want us to be ruled by Godless, evil, murderous men? Find me a passage that would indicate same.

"And even as they did not think fit to have God in their knowledge, God gave them up to a reprobate mind, to do the things not right, having been filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, iniquity, covetousness, malice, being full of envy, murder, quarrels, deceit, evil habits, becoming whisperers, slanderers, God-haters, insolent, proud, braggarts, devising evil things, disobedient to parents, without discernment, covenant breakers, without natural affection, unforgiving, unmerciful, who knowing the righteous order of God, that those practicing such things are worthy of death, not only do them, but also approve those practicing them."
- Romans 1:28-32

It would appear that when a Nation turns it's back on God, God has a method of dealing with it appropriately.

Hope your weekend is good SJB!
90 posted on 04/16/2010 7:13:03 AM PDT by mkjessup (0bama squats to pee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson