[FrankR]

One thing about the left is, they talk a lot; they try to threaten and intimidate. They are trying to scare us away.

If they really wanted a confrontation, they would have already started it. They don't. They know they are overwhelmingly outnumbered and they know that their indiscretions will be met in kind.

More than likely - given the cloud of secrecy about the website ownership, etc. - it's a gang of purple-haired enviro punks trying to make a name for themselves, or get a government grant.

The TEA party movment IS going forward, and it will not be stopped by threats and intimidation. We no longer react when you shout "boo", or "racist"...we're coming, like the langoliers chomping their way to devour liberalism, we're coming.

At the last D.C. TEA party, CBS estimated of 2 million in attendance...no violence, no arrests. That, along with all of the other massive TEA party movement gatherings have provided a non-violent model for the world to see. Our track record is established as a non-violent movement. Having said that, if violence erupts, we know where it came from.

Now advice to the "mad hatters", just because we don't start anything, doesn't mean that we won't finish it.

[a fool in paradise]

“mad hatters” at least will be a convenient term to ID those who seek to upset the movement through shenanigans.

But they are trully the “teabaggers” in our midst.

Funny term that Anderson Cooper bestowed on the tea party movement, teabagger. A homosexual coined term and yet the media and the pinko Left call the tea partiers “homophobic” while using a homophobic insult.