To: cva66snipe; All
Fortunately, it seems most everyone is interpreting "split" as "State's Rights".
58 posted on
04/09/2010 11:13:58 AM PDT by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
To: knarf
Fortunately, it seems most everyone is interpreting "split" as "State's Rights". It's the first step. If congress can respect that then I see no problem. If a majority of persons say in California want to live under third world conditions and a Nanny State then let them as a state. Just stop trying to impose such on the rest of the nation.
If congress refuses to honor states rights? The founding fathers showed us what must be done. That should be a last resort but never taken of the list of possibilities.
82 posted on
04/09/2010 2:11:18 PM PDT by
cva66snipe
(Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson