To: Lonesome in Massachussets
I didn't say he doesn't understand it; I said that given the explanation he's provided, he doesn't seem to. He completely ignores its purpose.
5 posted on
04/08/2010 9:22:04 AM PDT by
stormer
To: stormer
You have a point. Briggs often “plays cute”. He did the same thing in a post belittling statistical significance. If it weren't for statistical significance we would have no way of chosing between Newton and Jean Dixon.
6 posted on
04/08/2010 9:26:45 AM PDT by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(The naked casuistry of the high priests of Warmism would make a Jesuit blush.)
To: stormer
Or he is pointing out the fact that peer review in the climate feild has been corupted.
9 posted on
04/08/2010 9:38:21 AM PDT by
Ratman83
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson