Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: jbjd
After all, just because a candidate cannot get his or her name on the ballot does not mean the Electors cannot still elect that person to be President. (Presumably, however, they wouldn’t dare!)

Since the names of the electors do not appear on the Texas Ballot, (they do or did in some states), how would someone who wanted to vote for Obama get elected anyway?
...
Unless a "nonviable" candidate was put on the ballot, with the understanding that his/her electors would vote for Obama?

That would presumable be legal, since Texas does not punish "faithless" electors. The party generally selects the actual electors. In a very real sense, we are voting for the party, and technically are voting for the electors, not the candidate whose name appears on the ballot.

24 posted on 04/07/2010 6:49:28 PM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: El Gato

“In a very real sense, we are voting for the party, and technically are voting for the electors, not the candidate whose name appears on the ballot.”

Yes, exactly! And this is the part of the Constitution the political parties (which are not mentioned in the document) would have us forget. Because these Electors are loyalists of the Party! (Try reading NEVER LESS THAN A TREASON (1 and 2) on my blog. This narrative touches on the highlights of the election process as they played out in the 2008 election cycle.)


28 posted on 04/07/2010 8:11:41 PM PDT by jbjd (http://jbjd.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson