Skip to comments.Kerchner v Obama & Congress Appeal - Activity in the Case
Posted on 04/06/2010 9:37:40 PM PDT by rxsid
click here to read article
When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdoms dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.s children.http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate.html
It can't. Of course not. Yet, right there, on his campaign web site F.T.S., it's stated that a foreign government "governed" Barry from birth and the reason it did, was that Barry inherited that foreign citizenship by way of his foreign national father (no matter where he was born). Assuming, of course, that Sr. was his legal father at birth.
How, then, could he possibly be a "Natural Born Citizen" of the U.S.?
Barry Soetoro, the divided citizen at birth!
Furthermore: Hawaii's Territorial Law, Chapter 57 - "VITAL STATISTICS, I", shown beginning pg 23 of 29, (the law in effect in 1961) allowed baby's born anywhere in the world to be eligible to apply for a Hawaiian birth certificate based on the word of 1 relative.
"Kerchner v Obama & Congress Appeal - Activity in the Case "
will read later .. kinda late in the East Coast. Thanks for posting.
Good to see Apuzzo has added the David Ramsey dissertation to the case against Obama.
It’s already been sent to him.
Apuzzo also included The American Law Review article by George Collins “Are Persons Born Within the United States Ispo Facto Citizens Thereof?”
Wonder if he has the video of Michelle saying Kenya is Barack’s homeland?
I don't know how he could miss it.
Mario Apuzzo is a real patriot along with Mr. Kerchner. Mario just keeps patiently plugging away.
I have felt that his case from the beginning has always been a real sleeper.
So if he loses in the Court of Appeals in Newark - what is the next step? SCOTUS?
I beleive that's correct, yes. It will wind up there even if they win, though. Whether or not SCOTUS would hear it, is another thing. If they win, I would think SCOTUS would almost certainly hear it. If they (Kerchner) loose, not so sure.
Thanks for the ping. Watching and praying for Mr. Apuzzo and this case.
There was supposedly something unique about Mario’s case that was a bit different. I forget what it was.
~ ~ ~
Note for tomorrow
Atty Apuzzo & CDR Kerchner on Revolution Radio Show hosted by Dr. Kate -
Wed, 07 Apr 2010, 9:10 p.m. EST
Atty Mario Apuzzo and CDR Kerchner will be guests on Revolution Radio Show hosted by Dr. Kate on Wednesday, 7 April 2010, at 9:10 p.m. EST.
Direct link to Revolution Radio show at BlogTalkRadio.com:
Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Commander USNR (Retired), Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner v Obama & Congress
Please if you can, see this site and help the cause: http://www.protectourliberty.org
8:10AM our time. *sigh* Maybe.
Perhaps it was that they included Congress, the Senate, the House, Cheney and Pelosi as (co) defendants.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.