>>>>”Anyone that openly supports the jihad should be looked upon as our enemy.”
To me that is a loose/generalized definition.
Based on what one reads on the Web & hears on the news, apparently “Jihadists” have become rather clever. IOW, it isn’t that clear cut, as it stands, who these “Jihadists” actually are, or potentially can be.
>>>>”Our freedoms should not apply to them, they should have no right to assemble and destroy us from within.”
Ok, that would call for a different set of laws & intervention than we now have in Western countries & societies. But, there has to be much less ambiguity per my first points in this comment.
What I’m saying is that while the intention to prevent potential or actual “Jihadists” in the West at least are in good faith, our current laws are inadequate & our approach seems rather emotional & impractical.
This is a complicated situation. In Western countries & societies, most “Jihadists” are home-grown. Most were born in Western countries.
I guess, one approach might be to send all “muslims” (born or converts) back to Islamic countries? At the same time, move all Christians and non-muslims out of muslim countries back to the West? Perhaps all economic deals between muslim and western countries should cease? Western (American/Nato/etc) troops should immediately withdraw from muslim countries? Churches (wherever in muslim countries) should be shut down, just as mosques in western countries? ....
I am not saying these are the solutions. I’m simply outlining some thoughts, and trying to outline the complexities. Some food for thought.
Sharia is the anti-thesis of Western Civilization. It should be banned. They any Muslim that calls for it arrested, and deported if possible.
I am for bringing the troops home as well, getting off of their oil, and then ending their immigration. You are correct, our laws are not working and if there is not some major changes we will eventually lose.
Happy Easter!