Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/31/2010 5:16:42 AM PDT by mattstat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: mattstat

Yes, we need a Global Elite to run the world, because we mere humans are just too stupid.

Let the Algore be King of the World.


2 posted on 03/31/2010 5:17:43 AM PDT by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mattstat
“Humans are too stupid to prevent climate change” Lovelock

Or, to believe in human caused change.

3 posted on 03/31/2010 5:17:53 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mattstat
Yeah James, I may be stupid, I may be ignorant...but at least I'm not a Liberal
4 posted on 03/31/2010 5:37:21 AM PDT by skully (I Hope Obama gets Gonorrhea for screwing America!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mattstat

Sorry James... it’s not that we’re too STUPID; Rather, we’re too insignificant.


5 posted on 03/31/2010 5:45:44 AM PDT by joethedrummer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mattstat

Yep!
We’re so stupid we can’t even control THE SUN!!

What dummies we are!


6 posted on 03/31/2010 6:08:18 AM PDT by Flintlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mattstat

This article reminds me of my little nieces. They are currently receiving the finest education that California taxpeyers can provide. They came to our house repaeating all of the green crap they learned in school, which sounds a lot like the kind of green crap that Briggs believes in. As the article states, Mr. Briggs it is not that people are too stupid to prevent “climate change”, some of us are just observant enough to realize that there are some things that mankind does not currently have the ability to control.


7 posted on 03/31/2010 7:18:51 AM PDT by fireman15 (Check your facts before making ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mattstat
"..we cannot confidently predict what the future holds. ."

If you cannot confidently predict what the future holds, what is your point ?

8 posted on 03/31/2010 7:47:10 AM PDT by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mattstat
If (1) human-beings aren't "too bright," and (2) Mr. Lovelock is a human-being (please, let's just assume arguendo for the time being, ok?), then (3) Mr. Lovelock is not "too bright" - that is, Mr. Lovelock is stupid, and therefore (4) has no basis for asserting that his claims to "know" about climate change are more truthful - more accurate - than the competing counter-claims made by any other human-being regarding climate change.

Ergo, on the basis of his own premises, Mr. Lovelock doesn't know what he's talking about and should shut the eff up.

Redistribution is Theft II, small
12 posted on 03/31/2010 8:47:24 AM PDT by Oceander (The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance -- Thos. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson