1 posted on
03/31/2010 5:16:42 AM PDT by
mattstat
To: mattstat
Yes, we need a Global Elite to run the world, because we mere humans are just too stupid.
Let the Algore be King of the World.
2 posted on
03/31/2010 5:17:43 AM PDT by
Travis McGee
(---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
To: mattstat
Humans are too stupid to prevent climate change LovelockOr, to believe in human caused change.
3 posted on
03/31/2010 5:17:53 AM PDT by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: mattstat
Yeah James, I may be stupid, I may be ignorant...but at least I'm not a Liberal
4 posted on
03/31/2010 5:37:21 AM PDT by
skully
(I Hope Obama gets Gonorrhea for screwing America!!!)
To: mattstat
Sorry James... it’s not that we’re too STUPID; Rather, we’re too insignificant.
To: mattstat
Yep!
We’re so stupid we can’t even control THE SUN!!
What dummies we are!
6 posted on
03/31/2010 6:08:18 AM PDT by
Flintlock
To: mattstat
This article reminds me of my little nieces. They are currently receiving the finest education that California taxpeyers can provide. They came to our house repaeating all of the green crap they learned in school, which sounds a lot like the kind of green crap that Briggs believes in. As the article states, Mr. Briggs it is not that people are too stupid to prevent “climate change”, some of us are just observant enough to realize that there are some things that mankind does not currently have the ability to control.
7 posted on
03/31/2010 7:18:51 AM PDT by
fireman15
(Check your facts before making ignorant statements.)
To: mattstat
"..we cannot confidently predict what the future holds. ." If you cannot confidently predict what the future holds, what is your point ?
8 posted on
03/31/2010 7:47:10 AM PDT by
libh8er
To: mattstat
If (1) human-beings aren't "too bright," and (2) Mr. Lovelock is a human-being (please, let's just assume
arguendo for the time being, ok?), then (3) Mr. Lovelock is not "too bright" - that is, Mr. Lovelock is stupid, and therefore (4) has no basis for asserting that his claims to "know" about climate change are more truthful - more accurate - than the competing counter-claims made by any other human-being regarding climate change.
Ergo, on the basis of his own premises, Mr. Lovelock doesn't know what he's talking about and should shut the eff up.

12 posted on
03/31/2010 8:47:24 AM PDT by
Oceander
(The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance -- Thos. Jefferson)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson