Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/30/2010 9:00:06 AM PDT by jay1949
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: cva66snipe

*ping*


2 posted on 03/30/2010 9:18:34 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

bfl


3 posted on 03/30/2010 9:21:09 AM PDT by Born Conservative ("I'm a fan of disruptors" - Nancy Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jay1949
Nothing is more likely to rile up a lowland Scot than to tell him that he speaks a "dialect of English."

No, he'll tell you, he doesn't. Lowland Scots is a separate language!

(It's sometimes referred to as "Lollans," whereas the slightly different version spoken in northern Ireland is called "Ullans.")

4 posted on 03/30/2010 9:57:04 AM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jay1949
Seems like there's a real brew-ha-ha brewing over this question.

showing that Scottish English, imported primarily by the Scotch-Irish (Ulster Scots or Scots-Irish, if you prefer), had a greater impact on the Appalachian English dialect than did the tongues of Southern England,

5 posted on 03/30/2010 10:12:29 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jay1949

Scotch is a drink not a people. Makes me not want to read any further since the writer is not smart enough to know that


6 posted on 03/30/2010 10:16:32 AM PDT by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson