Back to the thread.
. . . . Check out # 72, # 84 , # 87 , # 93 , # 95 , # 96 , # 100 .
Or his LSAT's (and SAT's). The release of LSAT's more consistent with a mid-level law school than with HLS Magna would be devastating. Obama's only life achievements are being named President of HLR, and making Magna at HLS. A 60'ish percentile LSAT would show these HLS honors to be contrived, and his resume to be fraudulent. If this is shown to be a fraud, then the question is what else? It calls the autobiographies into further question, etc. Pull on that string, and the whole thing collapses.
Back to the thread.
. . . . Check out # 72, # 84 , # 87 , # 93 , # 95 , # 96 , # 100 .
“The other professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified, never attended any of the faculty meetings, and it was clear that the position was nothing more than a political stepping stool. According to my professor friend, he had the lowest intellectual capacity in the building. He also doubted whether he was legitimately an editor on the Harvard Law Review, because if he was, he would be the first and only editor of an Ivy League law review to never be published while in school (publication is or was a requirement). “
I posted here recently that Obama was an average student(being kind here) who was a affirmative action junkie, both at Columbia, and Harvard Law. I doubt his SAT scores exceeded 550, and about the same for the LSAT....not high enough to get into ANY law school, let alone Harvard.
His whole life is a fraud.