Posted on 03/30/2010 8:30:01 AM PDT by big black dog
The smartest genius President evah is nothing more than a carboard cutout. A fraud. Doesn't exist. We don't even know how he did in school because to this day his transcripts are sealed. Turns out now that when he was an instructor at the Chicago, his colleagues who were actual Professors didn't like him and didn't want him. Obama's position was obtained through political channels.
Is the President's resume accurate when it comes to his career and qualifications? I can corroborate that Obama's "teaching career" at Chicago was, to put it kindly, a sham.
I spent some time with the highest tenured faculty member at Chicago Law a few months back, and he did not have many nice things to say about "Barry." Obama applied for a position as an adjunct and wasn't even considered. A few weeks later the law school got a phone call from the Board of Trustees telling them to find him an office, put him on the payroll, and give him a class to teach. The Board told him he didn't have to be a member of the faculty, but they needed to give him a temporary position. He was never a professor and was hardly an adjunct.
The other professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified, never attended any of the faculty meetings, and it was clear that the position was nothing more than a political stepping stool. According to my professor friend, he had the lowest intellectual capacity in the building. He also doubted whether he was legitimately an editor on the Harvard Law Review, because if he was, he would be the first and only editor of an Ivy League law review to never be published while in school (publication is or was a requirement).
Consider this: 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a "lawyer". He surrendered his license back in 2008 possibly to escape charges that he "fibbed" on his bar application. ...
4. A senior lecturer is one thing. A fully ranked law professor is another. According to the Chicago Sun-Times, "Obama did NOT 'hold the title' of a University of Chicago law school professor". Barack Obama was NOT a Constitutional Law professor at the University of Chicago.
5. The University of Chicago released a statement in March, 2008 saying Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) "served as a professor" in the law school, but that is a title Obama, who taught courses there part-time, never held, a spokesman for the school confirmed in 2008.
6. "He did not hold the title of professor of law," said Marsha Ferziger Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and Lecturer in Law at the University of Chicago School of Law.
7. The former Constitutional senior lecturer cited the U.S. Constitution recently during his State of the Union Address. Unfortunately, the quote he cited was from the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution.
10. By the way, the promises are not a notion, our founders named them unalienable rights. The document is our Declaration of Independence and it reads: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
11. And this is the same guy who lectured the Supreme Court moments later in the same speech?
When you are a phony it's hard to keep facts straight.
For a constitutional senior lecturer, it's also noteworthy that Obama doesn't know what car insurance covers
UPDATE: Doug Ross updates with this: Most Transparent President Ever Has Bar Records Redacted This Week, Leaving Only Traces of His Existence Some Betamax Videos and a Fraternity Pin
President Obama's Occidental College transcripts have never been released. His Columbia transcripts are, likewise, AWOL. And his Harvard Law transcripts also haven't been made public. Finally, it's reported, he never published any articles while at Harvard, yet somehow served as Editor of Law Review. That would make him unique among editors, according to insiders.
Even John "D Student" Kerry was guilt-tripped into releasing his transcripts.
Curiously, since I relayed a report of Obama's "teaching career" at Chicago (he was apparently never a law professor, as some have claimed), the Illinois Bar has decided to partially redact what little public information it had available on its website related to the President's legal status.
UPDATE #2: Another from Doug Ross: Rub a dub dub, how many IDs does one profile need?
An anonymous tipster points out that the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of Illinois has gone through some amazing contortions maintaining a single database record for a retired attorney named Barack Obama.
Obama is only transparent in the sense that his past is invisible.
Wally, it is only people like you, who try to find some thread of actual meaning in his words, who doubt the undoubted genius of the greatest orator since Demosthenes. Everyone on TV says so.
Try this. The next time Our Anointed Leader (OAL) speaks, turn off the sound on your television. As his majestic head sweeps from the teleprompter on the left, to the one on the right, move your head in synchronization with his. Avoid looking straight ahead, as he does.
Soon Wally you will become very slee............
I am reading this ping from 2 teleprompters.
Thanks for the list. We have been looking for someone to replace Barney Frank, to continue the job he is doing on the people.
Thanks for the ping.
NOT HIS DECISION TO MAKE What this self-absorbed Lipless Wonder fails to fathom is that his constituients (including those townhallers he sneered at) will decide whether he is fit to run for reelection. Now Frank wants to talk about his "record?" Fine. Here it is.
Let The Inquisition Start With Barney Frank
Investor's Business Daily | 3/6/09
FR Posted on 03/08/2009 by FreeManN
Congressman Barney Frank says he wants some of those responsible for our current financial meltdown to be prosecuted. And we couldn't agree more. First up in the court dock: Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass. Even by the extraordinarily loose standards of Congress, it takes some chutzpah for someone such as Frank to suggest that he'll seek prosecutions for those behind the housing and financial crunch and for what he called "a strongly empowered systemic risk regulator." Frank: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's point man in Washington.
For Frank, perhaps more than any single individual in private or public life, is responsible for both the housing market mess and subsequent bank disaster. And no, this isn't partisan hyperbole or historical exaggeration. But first, a little trip down memory lane. (Excerpt) Read more at ibdeditorial.com ...
======================================
THE WORM TURNS The Poor Should Rent, Not Own (Barney Frank admits disastrous mistake)
The Atlantic | 02/01/10 | Daniel Indiviglio
FR Posted 02/02/2010 by TigerLikesRooster
In its final installment of the "What Went Wrong" Series on the financial crisis, Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-MA) spoke up. Much of it was predictable: Frank ralked like anyone closely following the financial regulation push in Congress already knew. But there was one fascinating gem in his discussing where Fannie and Freddie went wrong. Frank says urging the poor to own homes was mistake, and now believes they should rent instead.
Frank's take on how Fannie and Freddie could be structured to avoid moral hazard and a too cozy relationship with regulators: After stating that we should separate the liquidity creation function from the subsidy objective ( which we already knew he supported), he said: "I think you separate out the function of providing the equity in general for the mortgage market and doing some subsidy and, in my judgment, the subsidy again, as I said before, should be focused on affordable rental housing, not in pushing low income people into owning homes that they can't afford." (Excerpt) Read more at business.theatlantic.com ...
Glibness combined with voter stupidity equals “The Divine One.”
Most of the day to day work was carried out by the managing editor of the Review, my predecessor, a great guy called Tom Pirelli
1. In 2007 Carol Platt Liebau wrote an extremely positive Townhall article about her impressions of Obama from HLR.
2. Apparently "Pirelli" shoud be "Perrelli".
Pathological liars lie for their own benefit, to save their own hide; they do not care a whit about anyone except themselves. Pathological liars are lacking empathy; and the lacking of empathy is called psychopathy.
Psychopathy is a personality disorder characterized by an abnormal lack of empathy combined with strongly amoral conduct, masked by an ability to appear outwardly normal.
Researcher Robert Hare, whose Hare Psychopathy Checklist is widely used, describes psychopaths as “intraspecies predators” as does Simon.
Elsewhere Hare and others write that psychopaths “use charisma, manipulation, intimidation, sexual intercourse and violence” to control others and to satisfy their own needs.
Hare states that: “Lacking in conscience and empathy, they take what they want and do as they please, violating social norms and expectations without guilt or remorse”. He previously stated that: “What is missing, in other words, are the very qualities that allow a human being to live in social harmony”
According to Hare, psychopaths are glib and superficially charming, and many psychopaths are excellent mimics of normal human emotion; some psychopaths can blend in, undetected, in a variety of surroundings, including corporate environments.
According to some, there is neither a cure nor any effective treatment for psychopathy; while psychopaths who undergo traditional talk therapy only become more adept at manipulating others.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy
[This information, and much more about psychopaths, can be found in a hospital medical library.]
ping for later reference.
What about *before* they become president of the LR?
Normally that's a way of saying "I can't recall his name", but in this case ... it's more like "I have no clue what his name really is, was, or might be in the future, and neither does anyone else"
Describes my experiences to a T.
BTTT for a great list!
Some time last year I noticed that the last several years of the Harvard Law Review is now online so I took a look at it. I checked the last seven presidents of the review and found that none of them had written articles for the review (even before they were president), although a couple of them were credited with assistance in footnotes. It turns out that the "articles" in the HLR are all written by famous law professors, not students who don't even have their JD. There are other parts of the HLR that review current legal cases of interest, etc. These parts are put together by the editors of the review, perhaps including the president, but all these parts are written anonymously.
BTW a relative of mine who attended another law school did publish an article in their law review under his name while he was a student, but it appears that this is not at all the usual practice at the HLR.
we need a break on this like we got with the East Anglia climate emails.........
hell of a story buried there
obumpa
bttt
I disagree.
Pathological liars have to feel superior to you. They are pumping up their own egos because they have an internal sense of inadequacy.
The pathological liar will tell you a lie when in fact the truth would be of more benefit to him, but he does so because when he is through with you and meditating on his accomplishments, he is gloating in the belief that he is smarter than you are; that you were dumb enough to believe it.
But mainly, he is pumping his own ego.
Am I a psychiatrist or a psychologist?
No, I am not. But my brother is a psychological psychopathic serial liar who, if you listen to him would have you believe that he was agent 007 in WWII.
He actually won it.
Obummer, the Marxist now posing as a Fascist, lies to you because he believes that he is so smart and so convincing and that you are such an ignorant red neck that you believe him. After all, as he has said, he won. You did not.
That's "not high enough to get YOU or ME into any law school." Besides, John, mention of the SATs and LSAT is forbidden in regard to the past of Our Anointed Leader. Of course, that goes for the rest of his past, too.
Obama is a ghost.
(I was being generous with the 550. Obama is not intelligent
by ANY standards) ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.