Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: edge919

The statute doesn’t say subpoena, but a court order (there is a difference). Notice too that it gives the department latitude in responding to court orders as being from ‘competent jurisdiction.’ IOW, they could probably ignore out-of-state court orders.


A subpoena is one form of a court order.
The statute doesn’t say a HAWAII court of competent jurisdiction. Every state in the union accepts subpoenaes from courts in the other states. Otherwise no one would ever get extradicted.

In any event, it would be nice if someone would at least try this method like 74 plaintiffs have tried civil suits thus far. None have succeeded but folks keep on trying.
I’d like to see someone try the criminal side as well as the civil side.


91 posted on 03/25/2010 1:36:56 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: jamese777

A court of competent jurisdicition is, in general any court having jurisdiction over the offense being investigated or the persons being investigated. A department or agency can turn down a subpoena if they think the court in question fails to show competent jurisdiction. So far, several officials in Hawaii have been willing to go to bat to keep Obama’s birth records secret. I could this requiring a federal court order before Hawaii would comply, but we know this won’t happen because we know who controls the justice department.


95 posted on 03/25/2010 1:59:24 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson