[Non-Sequitur]

I expect you to back it up instead of slinking off into the darkness...

Ryder v U.S. (151 US 177)

[rolling_stone]

Thanks for confirming my position

We therefore hold that the Court of Military Appeals erred in according de facto validity to the actions of the civilian judges of the Coast Guard Court of Military Review. Petitioner is entitled to a hearing before a properly appointed panel of that court. The judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/94-431.ZO.html