Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/23/2010 11:26:40 AM PDT by thekansascitian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: thekansascitian

The premise of the article is wrong, because we now know that Stupak would have voted for Obamacare anyway even WITHOUT the Stupak-Pitts amendment. He probably didn’t even have to get the airports and the nonsense letter from Zero to vote yes, but got them anyway.

Stupid is as Stupak does.


2 posted on 03/23/2010 11:51:39 AM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thekansascitian

This is no day of infamy for pro life. Stupak is and was NEVER pro life. That was a scam for voters in his district. There ARE no pro life democrats in DC.


3 posted on 03/23/2010 12:16:04 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thekansascitian

I need instructions on how to post photos. This photo of Chamberlain’s appeasement speech needs to have Stupak’s face put into it. http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/09/09/article-1053798-0283213600000578-277_468x374.jpg


4 posted on 03/23/2010 1:13:06 PM PDT by eccentric (a.k.a. baldwidow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson