Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 03/19/2010 10:16:15 PM PDT by Sidebar Moderator, reason:

Triplicate
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2475143/posts



Skip to comments.

Stupak Abortion Language to Be Substituted for Senate Language in Deal to Secure Health Care Votes
FireDogLake ^ | March 19, 2010 | Jane Hamsher

Posted on 03/19/2010 9:55:39 PM PDT by Steelfish

Stupak Abortion Language to Be Substituted for Senate Language in Deal to Secure Health Care Votes By: Jane Hamsher March 19, 2010

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has made a deal with Rep. Bart Stupak in order to secure his vote and that of other anti-choice Democrats for the health care bill, which is scheduled to be voted on this Sunday. According to a member of Congress who was briefed on the matter, Pelosi has agreed to let Stupak have a vote on his amendment either before or after the House votes to pass the Senate bill. It instructs the Senate to substitute the language in his amendment for the Senate language on abortion.

FDL has obtained a copy of the concurrent resolution (PDF1, PDF2, PDF3, PDF4), which includes cosponsors Marion Berry, Sanford Bishop, Joseph Cao, Kathy Dahlkemper, Steve Driehaus, Marcy Kaptur, Dan Lipinski, Alan Mollohan, and Nick Rahall. A second source confirms that with the exception of Cao, these are the members of Congress who are still on the fence. Cao is still considered a firm “no” vote.

The deal calls for Stupak to have a vote on his amendment either before or after the House votes to confirm the Senate bill on Sunday. Stupak is confident that he has the votes to pass the measure, and is happy to have the vote after the House passes the Senate bill. He believes that by using a “tie bar” approach, his amendment would be “tied” to the health care bill — which would require just 51 votes in the Senate.

Pro-choice members of the House, however, are demanding that the vote on the Concurrent Resolution happen before the House confirms the Senate bill. If in fact it passes, they plan to vote against confirming the Senate bill.

(Excerpt) Read more at firedoglake.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 03/19/2010 9:55:39 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

You are about three hours too late.


2 posted on 03/19/2010 9:56:57 PM PDT by Perdogg ("Is that a bomb in your pants, or are you excited to come to America?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

STUPAK... Pelosilini is LYING to you... DON”T FALL FOR IT!!


3 posted on 03/19/2010 9:58:38 PM PDT by gwilhelm56 (Islam is a Political System DISGUISED as a RELIGION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

domt they have to vote on the bill EXACTLY AS WRITTEN in the senate or nothing?????????

these bastards are going to start a civil war...


4 posted on 03/19/2010 9:59:28 PM PDT by Mr. K (This administration IS WEARING OUT MY CAPSLOCK KEY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gwilhelm56

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2475194/posts


5 posted on 03/19/2010 10:01:54 PM PDT by Perdogg ("Is that a bomb in your pants, or are you excited to come to America?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

This isn’t happening. FDL is clueless as usual.


6 posted on 03/19/2010 10:03:59 PM PDT by HD1200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
. Stupak is confident that he has the votes to pass the measure, and is happy to have the vote after the House passes the Senate bill.

Don't get too confident, a lot of Republicans may not agree to be dupes in your fig leaf game this time. If enough decide to vote "Present", then your and Nancy's ploy goes up in smoke.

7 posted on 03/19/2010 10:04:55 PM PDT by randita (Sarah Palin has the same computer that I have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

I can’t keep up with all the treachery.

Ugly things this way come.


8 posted on 03/19/2010 10:05:36 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unkus
I can’t keep up with all the treachery.

Exactly what the Demonrats are counting on.

9 posted on 03/19/2010 10:09:37 PM PDT by Schatze (It's better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: unkus

This would cause the big 40 pro-choice Dems to vote NO. You can’t please one group without alienating the other. I ain’t buyin’ it.


10 posted on 03/19/2010 10:10:29 PM PDT by historyrepeatz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: randita

Makes no difference - this is all about giving Stupik a fig-leaf to allow him to vote YES on the Senate bill

He knows full well this side bill on abortion (to be voted on AFTER the hc vote) will in fact fail....


11 posted on 03/19/2010 10:11:26 PM PDT by VRWCTexan (Obama-scare is the "real" Cash for Clunker Program!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Schatze

That’s right.


12 posted on 03/19/2010 10:12:35 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson