Posted on 03/16/2010 5:30:43 PM PDT by MaxCUA
(Video) Obama The Lier: Employers Will Save 3,000% per employee once Health Care Passes - At Ohio Rally -
(Excerpt) Read more at communists4obama.blogspot.com ...
Get that man some loaves and fishes and he can end world hunger.
3000%? Yep, he actually did say that.
And next the chocolate will be ~raised from 45gm to 25gm per week. Yipee!
This needs to go viral on the net.
I wonder if Obama will shoot Totus! Perhaps Gibbs will pull its plug.
Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia.
And “the fainter” at that speech did was not a fainter, he was a heckler and O had him tackled by security and removed while his companion yelled “How Dare You!” to the fake president, all the while the fake president covered it up saying “someone’s fainted, can we get a medic? Medic please, no, no, listen, someone’s fainted, give him or her some room please, can we get a medic?”.
Evidently “medic” was the code word for send in the goons, we have a heckler.
He made a mistake but was to stupid to know how to correct it. So he just moved on with his BS.
I heard Rush talk about this today. If your employer pays $4000 a year for your health benefits and this bill cuts premiums by 100%, the employer would pay nothing for health care. If it cut it by 3000% the employer would receive $120,000 for giving health care to each employee. Where’s the media attention to this ridiculous lie? Imagine if GW Bush said this.
Uh...that would be “liar”.
Lol, Pelosi Math!
Barry makes Dan Qualye look like Werner Von Braun.
The allotment of Victory Gin is still one fifth.
A reduction “by” is not the same as a reduction “of.” A reduction “by” means you divide (by), ie if an employer pays $10,000, a 3000% reduction is $10,000/ 3000% = $333. In other words if they paid $333 now, they saw a 3000% reduction. A reduction “of” would be $10,000 multiplied by 3000% giving you the crazy numbers, and that wouldn’t be a reduction! It would have been simpler if he had said employers may be paying up to 3% “of” their current cost. But then what sounds more profound, 3 or 3000? After-all it is politics.
You clearly have no freaking idea what you're talking about.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.