Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/15/2010 12:35:16 PM PDT by Shellybenoit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Shellybenoit
Whenever you cook one kind of fuel into another, there will be losses.
The best way to use bio-energy is to cultivate whatever weed grows best in that locale and shove it into a nearby burner to generate electricity or heat.
No other conversion is necessary.
Let the cars run on pure gasoline.
Don't compete with our food supply.
Wood is good!

2 posted on 03/15/2010 12:57:52 PM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit
Corn Ethanol generates 2x the energy than it takes to produce it. Sugar Cane Ethanol generates 8x the energy than it takes to produce it.

Wrong!!!!! Corn ethanol generates 2x less energy than it takes to produce it. Not sure what the figure is for sugar cane...but both are net losers.

3 posted on 03/15/2010 6:24:01 PM PDT by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Shellybenoit
Facts rarely are allowed to get in the way of a good rant, but "most of" the ethanol produced in the United States does not come from Archer Daniels Midland.

In 2009, there were 160 American producers of fuel grade ethanol, the largest of which produced 11% of the total volume. ADM, by the way, wasn't the largest; Poet Biorefining was, while Valero Energy was third.

6 posted on 03/15/2010 6:50:25 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson