Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Do you believe in a New World Order?
Liveleak ^ | 3-10-2010 | Liveleak

Posted on 03/10/2010 10:56:38 PM PST by bronxville

Do you believe in a New World Order?

Is this scheme to establish a New World Order in fact a reality? Yes it is. If you do not believe this I encourage you to study the United Nations documents and also the treaties which, once ratified by individual nations, become INTERNATIONAL LAW. The United Nations created the Commission for Global Governance, if you don't believe this, visit the United Nations website and look it up.

The C More..ommission for Global Governance released a report: Our Global Neighbourhood, that predicates a world court, a global tax, and global police force. And the U.S. State Department Publication 7277 outlines a one world police force under the United Nations. So many prominent world leaders are calling for a one world government the intention is obvious. Yet most people are so occupied by life's responsibilities, careers, sports and television, they have little time to study what's going on in the corridors of power.

The coming one world government is being set up in the political arena under the flag of the United Nations, through organizations such as the Trilateral Commission, Council of Foreign Relations, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Bilderbergers, and the Club of Rome whose members include many world leaders, media personalities and other influential people. The published goal of the Council of Foreign Relations for example is a one world government. And although most have never heard of many of these groups, they do exist, and they are very influential. The core of these groups hold to "illuminist" philosophy.

A second focus is economics with free trade agreements, the International Monetary Fund, World Bank and the Bank of International Settlements. The coming global monetary crisis is intended to institute a universal debt-based currency controlled by the International Financiers and issued to individuals against biometric identification cards. This is all about control!

The third area of focus is religion. Organizations like the World Council of Churches and the Parliament of World Religions were established to introduce a new world religion. It is based on a pantheistic/humanist philosophy. Pay careful attention when you study the documents and reports published by the United Nations and related organizations. This philosophy is now being taught in the education system and has been implemented under programs such as Goals 2000.

The New World Order will be SOCIALISM. Read the United Nations declarations and treaties for proof of this fact. The individual will be subservient to the state. Rights and power reside in and derive from the state, not the individual.

United Nations documents all speak of collectivism. They claim that private ownership and management of property is not to the benefit of the human race. These things are cloaked in a pleasant language, and most people are taken in and deceived. Yet few bother to study these documents.

In the New World Order you will be in serfdom to the controlling elite! You will have no liberty, and no rights. The State will look after you for your best interests. Do you see how the governments of the free world are slowly becoming more involved in everyday life? This is exactly what socialism is. The government becomes involved in every aspect of personal life. Today we require a license for so many things. In Australia, farmers now require permission to farm the land they own. This is not freedom.

In the New World Order, private ownership of property will be abolished. You will only own what you need "after all this is best for the world." "We need to be looked after."

Terms such as 'sustainable development' mean depopulation and serfdom. The masses continue to fall for lie after lie after lie. Study history and you will discover that there have been very few free societies. Those that were free were either overthrown or fell into the trap of socialism, totally unaware of the dangers until it was too late. Socialism (communism) is always implemented through deception. History portrays a repetitive phenomenon . . . enslavement-revolt-freedom-apathy-enslavement. Enslavement frequently followed revolution because the people did not realize that socialism was slavery, not freedom.

Today environment is being used to make people feel guilty, enticing them to accept socialism as necessary. The environmental movement has been co-opted to strip private ownership of control and exploitation of resources. Many environmental 'facts' are lies, exaggerations and unscientific claims to manipulate the masses in the classic Hegelian Dialectic: create the problem, create opposition to the problem, then present your own predetermined solution. Global warming is a perfect example.

I recommend reading the study, 'The Report From Iron Mountain,' which suggested the environment as a tool by which to manipulate the masses to accept loss of freedom to a one world government.

Although a landowner pays taxes, and is steward of his land, its usage is dictated by international bureaucrats, 'empowered' by vague treaties, driven by an insane 'theology', genocidal philosophy 'approved' by the bullying bribing tactics of governments.

"The United Nation�s goal is to reduce population selectively by encouraging abortion, forced sterilization, and control human reproduction, and regards two-thirds of the human population as excess baggage, with 350,000 people to be eliminated per day." Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO Courier, November 1991.

Anyone who speaks against the incoming system will be labeled 'anti government' or a 'trouble maker', and either executed or imprisoned with majority assent. Citizens will support the new order because they will have been brainwashed by propaganda and will not understand what is really happening. Already in the United States those who support the Constitution, Patriots and the Militia groups are ridiculed as crazy paranoids and dangerous extremists. In Australia, it's the supporters of Pauline Hanson's One Nation and Graham Campbell's Australia First Parties who are ridiculed and persecuted. These are merely people who are aware of what is going on. If you are one of those who believe that these patriots who are against globalism are crazy and deluded, I ask, have you ever spoken to one? Have you checked validity of their claims? or are you blindly following what the media feeds you?

Currently the United Nations is trying to establish the framework for an international criminal court. When this is established the United Nations will be able to detain anyone from any nation and bring them before a panel of judges who will hear the case and pass judgment. This international court will deal with are 'crimes against humanity' and 'environmental crimes.' If you think there is nothing wrong with this I suggest you read how the U.N. defines 'environmental crime.' A system is being created whereby those in control will be empowered to manufacture a crime and arrest anyone they deem a threat. The courts have no jury, one is guilty until proven innocent, and there is no appeal. Also, because this Court is international, and your nation has surrendered its authority, your own country cannot protect you. This is going to affect YOU directly!

In the coming world government YOU will have no personal liberty and no freedom. Did you know that the Global Biodiversity Assessment calls for human population to be reduced from 5.6 billion to 1 to 2 billion within the next decade? (reference GBA Section 9.2.3.2). You didn't see that on the six o'clock news, did you? Read the Declaration Towards a Global Ethic and learn what it classifies as 'authentically human.' This is a UNEP (United Nations Environmental Program) prepared by Hans Kung.

Learn how the United Nations define a 'hate crime.' Did you know for instance, that under Canadian law this website is classified as a 'hate' site? Pending U.N. legislation, and also 'Genocide Convention', classify this as a 'hate' site. However there is no hate whatsoever on this site, just a call for people to wake up to what is going on, and to receive God's Word. The only groups and/or people that I am against are those who believe in and seek to enforce socialism/Illuminism upon others.


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: artbell; awgeez; newworldorder; tinfoilhat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: allmendream
But one needn't invoke a conspiracy to explain it any more than one needs to invoke a conspiracy to explain why so many of our Generals graduated from Westpoint.

I'm not so sure that is a very good analogy. There are thousands of colleges and universities in the USA that produce quality graduates, yet the Ivy League seems to win out on POTUS' over the past 70 years or so regularly. So much so, given the mess we are in it should be an immediate disqualification for office if you hold a degree from an Ivy League school. The Army only runs one actual, full curriculum college, that being West Point. You can make to to field grade officer status through ROTC, but you'll have a much easier row to hoe if you are a 'pointer. The same is true with the Navy and Air Force.

41 posted on 03/11/2010 8:26:12 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker
Similarly, as is the case with all good analogy, if one went to Harvard and/or Yale and was a member of those societies such as the “skull and bones” and ‘summered in the Hamptons’ with the high muckity mucks, you also have an easier row to hoe.

No need to invoke conspiracy. It isn't a conspiracy when it is openly discussed. These types of societies are not ashamed to admit that their purpose is to make things easier for their members in terms of social, economic or political advancement.

42 posted on 03/11/2010 8:32:14 AM PST by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
It isn't a conspiracy when it is openly discussed.

Sometimes the best place to hide is in plain view.

The things that brought us to where we are now politically and financially aren't by chance. It's been well orchestrated over the past 100 years or so. For example, the systematic dumbing down of the population has been very well documented in several books, including The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America by Charlotte Thompson Iserbyt. I think it's available now on the net for free. Read it. It's a real eye opener. Similarly, the so-called "uptick rule" was relaxed 15 months before the last election and that allowed the market to be shorted into oblivion. This was clearly done to foster chaos in the markets and make them unstable. There is no other explanation for the removal of the uptick rule. The uptick rule had been in place since 1938 and had worked well to help stabilize the market. There are more examples that I can possible cite here, but these are two good examples.

43 posted on 03/11/2010 8:40:22 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker
There is nothing hidden because there is nothing to hide.

Yale and Harvard grads are an incestuous little group that has a majority grip on the reigns of power, not through anything nefarious, or anything secret; just that they think they are ‘the best’, and anybody who graduated from the same schools as them is similarly ‘the best’. Once this sort of thing gets started it tends to self-perpetuate.

No need to invoke a conspiracy. It isn't secret, there is no need to keep it secret. It isn't a conspiracy, it is called “networking”.

44 posted on 03/11/2010 8:45:22 AM PST by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
These types of societies are not ashamed to admit that their purpose is to make things easier for their members in terms of social, economic or political advancement.

So does the Kiwanis club and the Chamber of Commerce, but they aren't actively teaching and promoting Marxism to their members. The Ivy League schools are teaching the superiority of Marxism, as are a lot of other "higher learning" institutions in this country. I am amazed every time I return to my Alma Mater, Georgia Tech, and how Leftist it has become since I was a grad student there in the mid 80's. I'm equally amazed at how Marxism is being taught in gubmint skools, too. There's even a move afoot now to not teach US history prior to the War of Northern Aggression. How in the world can one be a good citizen of the USA when they don't understand or have any foundation in regard to the sacrifices the founders made to establish this great nation?

45 posted on 03/11/2010 8:52:12 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
There is nothing hidden because there is nothing to hide.

No, there is no reason to hide the Marxism anymore when you have over half the population willing to follow the Marxists and insure their own slavery. Why waste time and effort on hiding something when it is no longer necessary to achieve your goals?

46 posted on 03/11/2010 8:55:38 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker
So you think George W. Bush becoming President was a Communist conspiracy by the Yale “skull and bones” society?

OK then. An unlikely group of Communists, they being leaders of commerce and industry and whatnot, the first to be lined up against the wall and have their property confiscated by ‘the revolution’, but whatever; not like there are not self-hating white guilt liberal children of privilege who embrace Communism (Bill Ayers) and went Ivy League - but I doubt that the majority of Yale “bonesmen” are actually committed communists, let alone that they are some sort of communist conspiracy.

47 posted on 03/11/2010 8:58:48 AM PST by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

The days of Noe (Noah) and the flood that followed was not because of sodomy. Start reading in Genesis 6 to find out who was getting married. Children are never conceived out of homosexual relationships. I am not ignoring Sodom and Gomorrah, because we have Lot’s wife thrown into the Christian instruction. The WHO of the and the length of ‘time’ are why we are told what will be again.


48 posted on 03/11/2010 9:00:24 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
So you think George W. Bush becoming President was a Communist conspiracy by the Yale “skull and bones” society?

Marxist, not Communist. There is a difference.

49 posted on 03/11/2010 9:00:53 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker
Marx invented Communism. There is no difference. Liberals try to differentiate the different “flavors” of Communism (”Stalinist” “Trotskyist” “Maoist”, etc) but they are all the same thing.

There is no conspiracy, and Yale's “skull and bones” society make for a rather unlikely group of Marxists/Communists.

Are you also a 9-11 truther? A birther? A truther birther who sees a conspiracy behind every bush, or every Bush?

50 posted on 03/11/2010 9:04:48 AM PST by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
Marx invented Communism.

Some fundamentals of Communism are Maxist, but Communism as we know it was more of a product of Lenin, Stalin, and Mao. Marxism is about control. Communism is about control. However, the methods used are quite different if you take the time to look at it. Communists, as we know them, use brute force to achieve their goals. Examples, Mao, Pol Pot, Castro, Chavez, Stalin, Lenin, Hitler. Marxism uses various other methods to control the population like control of the currency (Wilson and the Federal Reserve, FDR taking us off the gold standard), control of the schools (Carter and the Department of (re)Education, Federal control of the curriculum, control of the teachers through the NEA, Bush II and No Child Left Behind, etc), control of access to health care (LBJ and Medicare, Medicaid, Bush II with Medicare Part D, S-CHIP and Obama's current health care folly), control of the press (MSNBC, See-BS, CNN, NYT, Washington ComPost, et al, most of whom are Ivy League grads) and the list goes on and on. It's all rooted in Marxism. The difference is we have industrial Marxists rather than petty, brute force dictators pulling the strings. Interestingly, President Eisenhower, a West Point grad, warned us about this in 1959 shortly before he left office. It's the robber barons of the 19th and early 20th century, except this time they aren't fighting the gubmint, they are the gubmint. Think about it. It's not an accident. None of this would be true if our gubmint would have stuck to the Constitution for the past 100 years or so. If they had there wouldn't be any lobbyists because there wouldn't be anything to lobby for.

51 posted on 03/11/2010 9:42:51 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker
Nothing to lobby for?

Preposterous.

There will always be disparate interest who will seek to influence legislation.

The right to “lobby” is spelled out directly in our Constitution.

52 posted on 03/11/2010 10:59:49 AM PST by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: mountn man

Thanks for the ping!


53 posted on 03/11/2010 12:11:05 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mountn man

Yes! I believe (JMO) after Obongo is out of office we will have the New Global World Order in full swing.


54 posted on 03/11/2010 1:04:26 PM PST by TaraP (He never offered our victories without fighting but he said help would always come in time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

I agree. I believe he will sign away our sovereignty as a nation.


55 posted on 03/11/2010 1:48:56 PM PST by mountn man (The pleasure you get from life, is equal to the attitude you put into it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: bronxville

Just do a nexus search on the term you’ll find all of them using it from the British to the Euros to the US to the third world.

They admit to things that you’d have been called crazy to believe just a few years ago.


56 posted on 03/11/2010 1:53:13 PM PST by NeoCaveman ("workers of the world unite, it's not just a slogan anymore" SEIU's Andy Stern)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle
Interesting. I just looked up stuff on it

Its amazing,its outright, in your face, we're siding with the devil. I'm not refering to the stars (though there is that). We have people, that if it weren't the Bible, would never have heard of Babel or Babylon, and yet they are choosing to take man back to that idea, and try to accomplish, what god destroyed.

Its as if they've read Daniel and Revelation, and are conciously choosing to be against God.

57 posted on 03/11/2010 2:13:51 PM PST by mountn man (The pleasure you get from life, is equal to the attitude you put into it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

Comment #58 Removed by Moderator

To: allmendream
Nothing to lobby for? Preposterous.

On the Federal level, if Congress and the POTUS would stick to the strict bounds of the Constitution there really would be nothing of any merit to lobby for on the Federal level, certainly none of the things that are bringing this nation down right now. Except for the items contained in Article 1, Section 8, everything else would be left to the States.....as it should be so they can be watched closely. This was precisely the intent of the Founders. Read the Federalist Papers for details.....

59 posted on 03/12/2010 4:33:51 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson