Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: neefer

The below was posted by another Freeper before, and I hope he doesn’t mind me posting it again, because the relentless fight for the justification of a women President continues. And the fight will go on as long as there is bigotry, discrimination, male chauvinism, fear, ignorance, and blindness to the hope Reagan spoke about.

The people who post and say that Palin has not enough executive experience should take a look back in history.
Lincoln, Kennedy and Truman (aside from two months as FDR’s VP) also had no executive experience, elective or appointive, when they became President.

Woodrow Wilson’s only executive experience was two years as Governor of New Jersey, after which he became President.
Calvin Coolidge, in addition to being Harding’ VP for two years, was governor of Massachusetts for two years and mayor of a small town of 3000 (Northampton)for two years. (sound familiar?) In Reagan’s opinion, as well as Bob Novak’s, Coolidge was the best President of the 20th Century (until the Gipper, of course).

Other Presidents,(Madison, John Quincy Adams, Buchanan Hoover) only had executive experience as appointed heads of cabinet agencies.

Ford had no real executive experience; He was VP under Nixon for less than a year.

That is a list of 10 Presidents, including some pretty good ones who had less than, or equivalent to, Sarah Palin’s executive experience. And I didn’t even count the large number of Presidents (10) whose executive experience consisted solely of being generals in the army. (Only three of the ten were Commanders in Chief, which would at least somewhat approximate the Presidency).

Sarah Palin’s experience stacks up quite well historically, if anyone takes the time to compare it to previous Presidents.


90 posted on 03/10/2010 10:28:55 PM PST by NavyCanDo (Palin in 2012 will see the Potomac from her House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: NavyCanDo
including some pretty good ones And some that were average at best. If we’re citing success of Presidents who lacked executive experience before office, let’s not forget to analyze the current president who seems to be letting his lack of experience show. Unlike Palin supporters, I’m not willing to pin all my hopes on someone with less of a career, hoping that she‘ll turn out to be Calvin Coolidge. Just because she shares my ideals doesn’t mean she has the political shrewdness to make those ideals reality.

Except for Kennedy, everyone on that list was older. Some where much older, having far more life experience than Palin will have in 2012. She’s never been an army general and so I'd have to disagree. And none of them were so deeply hated (except for Lincoln later in office). Sarah Palin herself admitted that she underestimated the deep seething hatred leftist had for her.

To me, Sarah Palin is an uncertain, very risky and volatile candidate who, if she does reach the Presidency, will have to waste much of it defending herself. That gives me great unease considering her political adversaries successfully forced her to resign as Governor.
114 posted on 03/11/2010 7:38:53 AM PST by neefer (Because you can't starve us out and you can't make us run.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson