Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/04/2010 3:48:05 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: decimon

BS BS BS BS. repeat 1000 times


2 posted on 03/04/2010 3:49:43 PM PST by chooseascreennamepat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

“Supercritical” sounds like a synonym for cranky.


3 posted on 03/04/2010 3:50:04 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

Fascinating. BTT.


5 posted on 03/04/2010 3:51:35 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

So! If we combine the two technologies (hybrid and transonic fuel injection) the car will get 100 mpg.


6 posted on 03/04/2010 3:52:57 PM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

I have one on the shelf next to the super-carb I bought at in the 1950’s at an estate sale for a GM exec.


8 posted on 03/04/2010 3:55:17 PM PST by WOBBLY BOB (ACORN:American Corruption for Obama Right Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

It appears to be s system for putting the fuel near the spark at the time of firing. sounds promising.


10 posted on 03/04/2010 3:58:28 PM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon
Transonic Combustion, based in Camarillo, CA, has developed a gasoline fuel injection system that can improve the efficiency of gasoline engines by 50 to 75 percent...

And if they put some of those tornado thingies in the intake, they can get like 100% or more!

11 posted on 03/04/2010 3:59:24 PM PST by Onelifetogive (Flame away...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon
that can improve the efficiency of gasoline engines by 50 to 75 percent, beating the fuel economy of hybrid vehicles.

Do we actually trust auto news from someone who does not know that a hybrid has a gasoline engine?

12 posted on 03/04/2010 4:01:01 PM PST by Onelifetogive (Flame away...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon
TSCi Fuel Injection achieves lean combustion and super efficiency by running gasoline, diesel, and advanced bio-renewable fuels on modern diesel engine architectures

I read this as they're running gasoline in a diesel engine, but maybe I misunderstand.
13 posted on 03/04/2010 4:04:04 PM PST by chrisser (Starve the Monkeys!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

Impossible.

This scheme’s only intent is to extract money from morons (read: Congressmen) who don’t have the faintest idea of Physics, Thermodynamics, Heat Transfer, Engine Cycles, Carnot Cycles, etc.


14 posted on 03/04/2010 4:04:49 PM PST by HighWheeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

Physics probably controls the fuel air mixture which is a constant for combustion as I understand it. No amount of buzzwords can change physics.

PS I will willingly retract my statement in relation to the discovery if it proves viable.


15 posted on 03/04/2010 4:04:51 PM PST by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

A 50 or 75 percent improvement would probably put a gas engine beyond its theoretical max efficiency.


17 posted on 03/04/2010 4:06:25 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

I think what they are doing is making the fuel explode instead of burn. In a normal IC engine the fuel burns. If it explodes, or detonates, it produces the pinging sound and can destroy the engine.


20 posted on 03/04/2010 4:45:19 PM PST by kik5150
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon
The real solution
22 posted on 03/04/2010 4:51:38 PM PST by Waverunner ( "Think for yourselves and let others enjoy the privilege to do so too." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

But I have the same thing that I built in my garage, and it burns water...

Seriously, where do these stories come from. If this were true, they wouldn’t be peddling stories, they would be gearing up for mass production.

The follow up to this story will be that these guys in black suits showed up and confiscated the only prototype, which can’t be recreated.


23 posted on 03/04/2010 4:57:01 PM PST by SampleMan (No one should die on a gov. waiting list., or go broke because the gov. has dictated their salary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

BTTT!


26 posted on 03/04/2010 5:34:15 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon; grellis; AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; ...

Thanks decimon. With anything like this it is necessary to A) prove reliability, B) prove it can be built reliably on an assembly line, and C) retain vicious attorneys. Nearly thirty years ago, Yunick’s adiabatic system used a combo of patented and proprietary things to build a 60 mpg three cylinder that had satisfactory performance; Ray Gorte prototyped a hydrocarbon-direct fuel cell; what do we have instead? Basically bupkis.


28 posted on 03/04/2010 7:25:46 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Freedom is Priceless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: decimon

The claims remain to be proven but my understanding that the major problem keeping super lean burning engines off the road is emmisions. Specifically NOs.

What they are claiming does not break the rules of thermodynamics but may break the rules of the EPA.


29 posted on 03/05/2010 7:51:37 AM PST by dangerdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson