Replies

He has not opened his records to the public. He posted a document which is suspect.

When you run for public office, we'll want to see your documents. Until then I don't care if you burn them. Not interested.

I am not a birther. Not interested in your comments about them. I am seeking the truth by asking for public viewing of the best evidence about the president. The best evidence being the documents in files he will not open.

He has sent attorneys into courts to fight having to provide his records. You are covering for him on this issue. Again what are your motives? Protecting a fraud suspect?

You are not defending the constitution since he has never established his qualifications for the job. You are doing just the opposite.

It is amazing to see people cover up and support someone who is hiding his life from public scrutiny. If he wants to be president he has to provide more information.

I said nothing about Article II. You are restricting the public access to relevant information about someone who sought the most powerful office in the world. A publicaly elected official. His schooling and passport info are indeed relevant and they can verify or counter what he has said about his life and experience. The character and truth about these people who run for office is directly related to their qualifications for the office.

It comes down to you covering for him and me seeking the truth. So name call all you want and characterize my positon any way you want. In the end the truth will be known.

"He has not opened his records to the public. He posted a document which is suspect."

It is not his fault that you guys keep moving the goal posts. Somebody asked to see his birth certificate and he provided it. Anything more is feeding the trolls.

"He has sent attorneys into courts to fight having to provide his records. You are covering for him on this issue. Again what are your motives? Protecting a fraud suspect?"

You remain woefully misinformed.

The lawyers were sent to defend him from lawsuits that somebody else filed. Not a single Birther lawsuit would have been settled by him providing his records. If you imagine otherwise, then you cannot have ever read a single Birther pleading.

Again... my motives are to defend the United States Constitution as per my oath. I can answer the question just as many times as you can ask it.

"You are not defending the constitution since he has never established his qualifications for the job. You are doing just the opposite."

He has absolutely established his eligibility (not "qualifications") for the job. If you have evidence that contradicts the COLB, then show it. Otherwise your flaccid assertions impress nobody other than your fellow travelers.

"I said nothing about Article II."

Well, then we have nothing to talk about. Because that's the only issue I've addressed in any of these threads. I am not defending and never have defended Obama... I am defending the Constitution from Birthers who are trying to rewrite it.