As I've posted before, I don't debate Birthers, I bait them into preposterous, paranoid and/or childish statements in defense of Birtherism, on the theory that the more lurkers laugh at you guys, the less likely they are to fall into your clutches. So no, I won't address your fantasy that a private eye named Phillip Spade, or Sam Marlowe, or this guy
somehow wrote a brief that changed the fact that Arthur's dad was a Brit, everybody knew it, and he still got to be President.
But please, post more about your theory that the United State Courts can use the Honduran Constitution to remove the President of the United States from office. Did a private eye named Mike Tracey or Dick Hammer wrote a brief about it?
You still are tap-dancing regarding his post and thereby using the changing subject tactics!!!
Well consuming too much of this stuff often skew the objectivity???
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilsener