Skip to comments.
Experts Warn: JPK III May Not Be Worthy of Kennedy Legacy
The Vitamin Press ^
| 02/28/2010
| Kip Hooker
Posted on 02/28/2010 6:56:22 PM PST by TheVitaminPress
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
To: gedeon3
41
posted on
02/28/2010 7:50:25 PM PST
by
TheVitaminPress
(as goes the Second Amendment . . . so goes the Constitution.)
To: Gay State Conservative
Don’t forget stealing elections, lobotomizing children, getting punked out by the Soviets and -possibly- killing Marilyn Monroe.
42
posted on
02/28/2010 7:53:44 PM PST
by
TheVitaminPress
(as goes the Second Amendment . . . so goes the Constitution.)
To: maine-iac7
Haha, the resemblance is uncanny.
43
posted on
02/28/2010 7:54:39 PM PST
by
TheVitaminPress
(as goes the Second Amendment . . . so goes the Constitution.)
To: TheVitaminPress
44
posted on
02/28/2010 7:55:01 PM PST
by
La Lydia
To: La Lydia
Thanks the story on our website has been updated to reflect this most recent development. It reads thusly:
Update: The Vitamin Press has just learned that Joseph P. Kennedy III will not be seeking congressional office this November. Our sources are confirming that he was not interested in pursuing any course of action that might deter from his goal of becoming Conan OBriens stunt double when he moves to Fox this fall. Special thanks to La Lydia for bringing this most recent development to our attention.
45
posted on
02/28/2010 8:02:27 PM PST
by
TheVitaminPress
(as goes the Second Amendment . . . so goes the Constitution.)
To: TheVitaminPress
He’s not running. He made a statement today.
46
posted on
02/28/2010 8:15:40 PM PST
by
nhwingut
(Palin/Bachmann '12)
To: TheVitaminPress
I dunno.
Ted (the Swimmer) Kennedy kind of set a threshold that serpents, insects, and various slime molds would be able to slither over...
Doubt JPK III (or whatever he is called) could 'fail' that standard (I assume that he has a pulse).
47
posted on
02/28/2010 8:18:11 PM PST
by
El Cid
(Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
To: nhwingut
48
posted on
02/28/2010 8:21:14 PM PST
by
TheVitaminPress
(as goes the Second Amendment . . . so goes the Constitution.)
To: El Cid
No doubt Teddy was an awful human being, but -at least in terms of horrible things done in a given lifetime- I think Joe might have been worse.
49
posted on
02/28/2010 8:28:03 PM PST
by
TheVitaminPress
(as goes the Second Amendment . . . so goes the Constitution.)
To: TheVitaminPress
50
posted on
02/28/2010 8:34:21 PM PST
by
capydick
(''Life's tough.......it's even tougher if you're stupid.'')
To: TheVitaminPress
"hollowed and universally respected Kennedy name"I'll give you the "hollowed" part (as opposed to hallowed) but universally respected? In what universe?
51
posted on
02/28/2010 8:40:47 PM PST
by
hometoroost
(I am not a crook, I did not have sex with that woman, and I am not an ideologue.)
To: capydick
52
posted on
02/28/2010 8:44:07 PM PST
by
TheVitaminPress
(as goes the Second Amendment . . . so goes the Constitution.)
To: TheVitaminPress
![](http://cache.boston.com/resize/bonzai-fba/Globe_Photo/2009/06/10/1244678233_8475/539w.jpg)
Joseph P. Kennedy III on the right
53
posted on
03/01/2010 1:21:15 AM PST
by
Mila
(t)
To: TheVitaminPress
"to live up to the hollowed and universally respected Kennedy name."
Of course the writer meant "Hallowed" but "Hollowed" is actually correct as to the Kennedy's. There is nothing in them.
54
posted on
03/01/2010 4:14:06 AM PST
by
Jimmy Valentine
(DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
To: Mila
Hey, who is that guy standing next to Conan?
55
posted on
03/02/2010 10:38:05 AM PST
by
TheVitaminPress
(as goes the Second Amendment . . . so goes the Constitution.)
To: hometoroost
Not one that I want to be visiting anytime soon.
56
posted on
03/02/2010 10:38:33 AM PST
by
TheVitaminPress
(as goes the Second Amendment . . . so goes the Constitution.)
To: Jimmy Valentine
I had seriously intended to claim that the use of the improper spelling of the intended word was on purpose and served the specific goal of bringing attention to the fact that the Kennedy's were -in fact- hollow men. But I have instead decided to do a very un-Kennedyesque thing and own up to my mistake!
57
posted on
03/02/2010 10:43:00 AM PST
by
TheVitaminPress
(as goes the Second Amendment . . . so goes the Constitution.)
To: TheVitaminPress
58
posted on
03/02/2010 11:55:34 AM PST
by
Mila
(t)
To: TheVitaminPress
“hollowed”....freudian slip???
59
posted on
03/02/2010 12:02:38 PM PST
by
gilor
(Pull the wool over your own eyes!)
To: TheVitaminPress
I had to check the source to make sure that it was hallowed, not hollowed...
60
posted on
03/02/2010 12:06:10 PM PST
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson