Replies

Notice that the post concerns only the B.C. issue that Barry has. Which of course, is a legitimate issue itself. What about his, born with, foreign citizenship? Can a NBC of the U.S., also, be born the subject of a foreign crown? Of course not.

HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN?

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.

http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate.html

It can't. Of course not. Yet, right there, on his campaign web site F.T.S., it's stated that a foreign government "governed" Barry from birth and the reason it did, was that Barry inherited that foreign citizenship by way of his foreign national father (no matter where he was born).
How, then, could he possibly be a "Natural Born Citizen" of the U.S.?
Barry Soetoro, the divided citizen at birth!

http://www.jeffersonsrebels.blogspot.com

Furthermore: Hawaii's Territorial Law, Chapter 57 - "VITAL STATISTICS, I", shown beginning pg 23 of 29, (the law in effect in 1961) allowed baby's born anywhere in the world to be eligible to apply for a Hawaii birth certificate based on the word of 1 relative. That is how a foreign born baby could get a HI BC on record, which in turn generates the "birth announcements" in the newspapers.

“What about his, born with, foreign citizenship? Can a NBC of the U.S., also, be born the subject of a foreign crown? Of course not.”

Unfortunately, 100% of the Congress chose to accept Obama as eligible, even though through unidentified proxies (with potential future deniability) he stipulated that the (legitimate only) children of his father were governed by the 1948 BNA.

This was, in my opinion, an unconstitutional defacto amendment of the constitution, but the matter has never properly come before SCOTUS for a definitive ruling as to what NBC means specifically for Obama.

For this SCOTUS review to occur, his original records must actually be subjected to discovery and challenge in court including witness testimony and international document authentication regarding any evidence that Obama was not born in HI or was adopted or expatriated and held Indonesian passports and citizenship.

“What about his, born with, foreign citizenship? Can a NBC of the U.S., also, be born the subject of a foreign crown? Of course not.”

Unfortunately, 100% of the Congress chose to accept Obama as eligible, even though through unidentified proxies (with potential future deniability) he stipulated that the children of his father were governed by the 1948 BNA.

This was, in my opinion, an unconstitutional defacto amendment of the constitution, but the matter has never properly come before SCOTUS for a definitive ruling as to what NBC means specifically for Obama.

For this SCOTUS review to occur, his original records must actually be subjected to discovery and challenge in court including witness testimony and international document authentication regarding any evidence that Obama was not born in HI or was adopted or expatriated and held Indonesian passports and citizenship.