[tired_old_conservative]

Polarik is unqualified to make the representations he did, particularly in the way he did. It's problems are self-evident if you've ever worked with people who do forensic document examination. They've been debunked on multiple occasions. Here's one example from a guy who actually does this sort of thing for a living, with real credentials:

http://hackerfactor.com/blog/index.php?%2Farchives%2F235-Bad-Science-How-Not-To-Do-Image-Analysis-Part-II.html

Also, Polarik was finally identified: “The identity of “Ron Polarik” has been found to be Ronald Polland, PhD of Florida. Dr. Polland is an ardent supporter of Israel, and has no academic credentials in image analysis.”

That's what's so clinical about all this nonsense. Birthers start with the answer and simply latch on to anything that supports it, no matter how obviously ridiculous. And they repeat it forever because facts don't mean anything to them.

[TigersEye]

That doesn’t wash. I just posted the statement of a forensic expert that does support his conclusions. You libs stand on the thinnest excuse for logic imaginable.

[wintertime]

By now the three of you are aware that 40 out of 90 representatives in the Arizona legislature have sponsored a bill that would require candidates to prove that they are conseitutionally eligible candidate. Likely many of these representatives are lawyers. All are responsible leaders in the communities, and many have excelled in business and their professions.

So?...These people are not flakes or nutz or fringers. They are evidently concerned enough to propose legislation that would prevent a usurper from gaining access to a government representative position.

Obama’s eligibility is like one of those helium inflated gorillas floating over a used car lot. Every day more helium is added and the gorilla grows bigger. There is NO possible way that this is going away.

[lucysmom]

Polarik is unqualified to make the representations he did, particularly in the way he did.

Absolutely!

Birthers start with the answer and simply latch on to anything that supports it, no matter how obviously ridiculous.

They will accept an analysis from a man with no name, no history, no verifiable education, and certainly no demonstrated expertise without question as long as Obama is the target.