My Churchill quote was very much "on point"... sometimes I just forget that everyone isn't as intelligent as I am, so I apologize for throwing one over your head like that.
Are you ok aligning with communists and jihadists?
As a rule? No.
When circumstances warrant it, yes.
Kind of like how when the whole nation was aligned with commies (WWII) or when the fedgov aligned with jihadists (Kosovo, Afghanistan 1979-1989).
Of course, I try not to do so when the jihadists are in the wrong (Kosovo) or when national interests are not at stake (Afghanistan 1979-1989).
Clear enough for ya, or do I need to draw a picture?
I take exception to your incorrect history lessons, We did not support Jihadis in Afghanistan or Kosovo.
In Afghanistan we supported those that were fighting for their freedom against the Soviets a very small minority of these were Jihadis.
In Kosovo we attempted to prevent genocide against muslims, again we did not support Jihadis who were the very small minority in that case as well.
Your blanket accusations that redefine history to suit your cause are the very thing you warn against, how then can anyone take you seriously when you violate your own accusations?
Neo-Con: Anybody who does not worship Ron Paul.
Statist: Anybody who does not worship Ron Paul.
Paul-Hater: Anybody who does not worship Ron Paul.
RINO: Any GOP candidate who is not Ron Paul.
Small-government conservative: This only applies to Ron Paul or Ron Paul disciples such as Debra Medina or Rand Paul. Nobody else is allowed to claim this.
Big-government supporter: Anybody who does not worship Ron Paul.
People who understand and support the Constitution: This only applies to Ron Paul or Ron Paul disciples such as Debra Medina or Rand Paul. Nobody else is allowed to claim this.
9/11: What the US deserved for refusing to roll over to Muslim terrorists in the Middle East.