Valerie Jarrett's nauseating condescension

The American Thinker ^ | February 24, 2010 | Katy Abram

[LibLieSlayer]

I was so focused on the inference of her words that I missed the actual ignorance of the English language exchange between the two dim butt-monkeys!

LLS

[webstersII]

She said we are “anti-government.”

No, we are anti-BIG government.

There is a huge distinction between the two.

[Ann Archy]

LOL!! Maybe she’ll AXE him to do that!!

[rollo tomasi]

The ignorant Statist read, for example, Obama's plans and go all hyper emotional, "workers of the world unite" crap then spew all sorts of baseless insults. The leaders laugh at the stupidity shown while eating up their corruption.

Responsible individuals who actual comprehend the dynamics of government, for example, adhering to history, reason abilities, etc..., read Obama's plans and actually understand the destructive ramifications that will be fostered on the populous.

The corrupt leaders go Machiavellian on the representatives of the responsible individuals. Lacking proper understanding of the seriousness, the representatives fold "like Superman on laundry day." Hence why we are in debt and idiots are empowered to act like fools while using the cover of "academia" to hurl mindless superciliousness.

[6SJ7]

"I think it's an excellent analogy...Part of our challenge is finding a very simple way of communicating."

Hey Valerie. Simple, like "corpse-man"?

[panaxanax]

That’s funny!

[panaxanax]

>>”I think it’s an excellent analogy...Part of our challenge is finding a very simple way of communicating.”<<

Valerie, you sure are an uppity negro, aren’t you?

STFU, you communist pig.

[nolongerademocrat]

I understand Valerie’s frustration. After all, she did lose a lot of money when the Olympics were not awarded to Chicago (slumlord stuff and all). Didn’t she serve on some hospital boards? I’d be interested to see how she would personally profit from Obamacare... Because as ignorant as I am (in their opinion), I do recognize that it’s all about the Benjamins for them.

[G Larry]

Liberal ideas can’t stand the light of day.

That’s why Air America failed.

[LibLieSlayer]

Thanks!

LLS

[dps.inspect]

Hey Val, your boss Vomit Obama has issues his very own version of the health care bill, but it can’t be scored because it is too vague. If the CBO can’t make enough sense of it to score it, then maybe it’s your problem... could it be, your not sophisticated enough to understand how our economy works to craft a workable solution, ever think of that, or maybe your purposely obfuscating for nefarious reasons?

[BobMV]

Odd that some are taking offense when it’s the questioner who said he would like some “simpler” explanations that people like tea partiers could understand. She basically just agreed with him that it was needed. Why aren’t we upset that this questioner asked the question? Maybe he was a plant?

[Scanian]

Valerie reminds me of a wolfing contest that George Jefferson once got into with a light-skinned friend of his kids. One of his lines was: “Hear dat e-lite negro talking that trash! Get outta my face fo’ I kick yo’ ass!”

Seriously, Valerie Jarrett, like Zer0 and Geithner, spent a large part of her youth outside the US. None of that group displays much in the way of patriotism. In fact, any of them would sell out the country in a minute to get what they want.

[driftless2]

The Obama admin is basically saying to the American public: how big should we make your big government? The public responds by voting out Dems in a myriad of countrywide races. The Obama admin then asks again in large block letters: We said: HOW BIG DO YOU WANT YOUR BIG GOVERNMENT TO BE??!!!!? In the fall, the Republicans take over congress. The Obama admin will still scratch their collective, thick heads wondering why their message didn’t get through. The facts: the message did get through. The result: the people don’t like the message.