To: jiminycricket000
According to the website I'll list below,Brown has cast three roll call votes.Two were "with Party" and one...the cloture vote...was "against Party".So,early in the game,this rookie is batting .667
Could be worse...
website: http://www.opencongress.org/people/show/412384_Scott_Brown
To: Gay State Conservative
According to the website I'll list below,Brown has cast three roll call votes.Two were "with Party" and one...the cloture vote...was "against Party".So,early in the game,this rookie is batting .667
It's supposed to be the other way around. He throws the leftwing Mass voters a bone or two on useless votes and sticks with us on the big ones (like the jobs stimulus bill).
25 posted on
02/23/2010 3:53:46 PM PST by
nhwingut
(Palin/Bachmann '12)
To: Gay State Conservative
"According to the website I'll list below,Brown has cast three roll call votes.Two were "with Party" and one...the cloture vote...was "against Party".So,early in the game,this rookie is batting .667" I'm also from the 'gay state', so I appreciate the improvement. But things have eroded so badly in America that a little patient 'improvement' isn't going to be enough, as I see it. I'm far less concerned about voting yeah or nay for some Union position than his voting for another Obama 'stimulous' package just two weeks into his term. Batting 667 sucks if he got two hits in the "big game" that produced no runs, then struck out with two outs, bases loaded, in the 9th, and lost the game by one run. Of the 3 votes he's cast, this latest one was by far the most important. I wish him well, but I'm concerned about him now.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson