Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Man50D

I’ve got to agree with you on being disappointed there.

Those who defend her endorsement of McCain on the grounds of loyalty must for the sake of consistency be perfectly fine with Pubbie pols who develop—and vote according to—deep webs of loyalties over years in Washington.

Yet from what I’ve seen of her so far, the good far exceeds the bad—and she’s looking far better than the other real ‘contenders’ we have.


5 posted on 02/23/2010 7:34:19 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: 9YearLurker
mitt just endorsed McCain for no reason whatsoever. he had no dog in the race, he had no honor to fulfill.

If its Mitt or Palin which would you rather have. One supports McCain due to a sense of honor, the other endorses McCain because he agrees with everything McCain says and does.

My vote goes to the one with honor-Palin

8 posted on 02/23/2010 11:36:41 AM PST by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson