Skip to comments.
Why does Sarah Palin support a RINO?
FOX News ^
| 02222010
| foxnews
Posted on 02/22/2010 7:33:59 AM PST by TheDailyChange
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
To: 353FMG
After the dust settles regarding what? This endorsement?
Come on — in two years time, nobody will remember or care. Few people outside of Arizona and this board know or care right now. Its a non-issue.
SnakeDoc
41
posted on
02/22/2010 8:28:41 AM PST
by
SnakeDoctor
(Do you know if the hotel is pager friendly? [...] I'm not getting a sig on my beeper.)
To: mkjessup
I joked early on that if Palin campaigns for McCain with the same intensity(sic) that he ran for President, she will be doing JD a favor.
42
posted on
02/22/2010 8:29:55 AM PST
by
mnehring
To: TheDailyChange
She is catching flack for the Perry support also.
43
posted on
02/22/2010 8:32:39 AM PST
by
Cheetahcat
(Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
To: stuartcr
She is entitled to her own opinion, right?
Funny, that's the routine that former FReeper/n00b '200 Motels' used to use, up until JimRob zotted him last week.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2455410/posts?page=83#83
44
posted on
02/22/2010 8:33:07 AM PST
by
mkjessup
(How do you spell 'real conservative' in Arizona? J.D. Hayworth !! - Flush McStain down the Drain!!)
To: mkjessup
45
posted on
02/22/2010 8:36:03 AM PST
by
stuartcr
(Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different)
To: mnehring
I joked early on that if Palin campaigns for McCain with the same intensity(sic) that he ran for President, she will be doing JD a favor.
I would not only LMAO, I would almost be willing to pay a year's salary to SarahPAC if she would start addressing the crowds ala McCain, "my frrrrrrrrrieeeeeends", with a hint of a wink, that damn phrase alone that McCain overuses is reason enough to bounce his ass on down to the local retirement home.
46
posted on
02/22/2010 8:36:19 AM PST
by
mkjessup
(How do you spell 'real conservative' in Arizona? J.D. Hayworth !! - Flush McStain down the Drain!!)
To: stuartcr
Just making an observation Stuart, nothing to be concerned about. Sheer coincidence.
47
posted on
02/22/2010 8:37:47 AM PST
by
mkjessup
(How do you spell 'real conservative' in Arizona? J.D. Hayworth !! - Flush McStain down the Drain!!)
To: mkjessup
No prob, just didn’t understand what you meant by routine.
48
posted on
02/22/2010 8:38:36 AM PST
by
stuartcr
(Everything happens as God wants it to...otherwise, things would be different)
To: TheDailyChange
Sarah is supporting McCain because she has something the overwhelming majority of politicians lack—CLASS.
To: stuartcr
didn't understand what you meant by routine
Poor choice of words. Sorry.
50
posted on
02/22/2010 8:41:56 AM PST
by
mkjessup
(How do you spell 'real conservative' in Arizona? J.D. Hayworth !! - Flush McStain down the Drain!!)
To: TheDailyChange
Sarah right now has got herself into two big problems concerning McCain:
1. Most of us really dislike McCain. Should McCain win his senate seat, Sarah will be perceived as culpable for his win.
2. If McCain should lose his senate seat, she will be perceived as having been weak.
I like Sarah, but I am very open to other possibilities. Right now she is not my first choice anymore.
To: mkjessup
McCain is Public Enemy # 1 to conservatism. Sarah should have stayed out of this altogether. If Haworth loses by one or two points, Sarah will be the sole reason, due to her popularity. For me? No sale!
52
posted on
02/22/2010 8:45:14 AM PST
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Support our troops, and vote out the RINOS)
To: All; Dilbert San Diego; seenenuf; seekthetruth; Chigirl 26; flaglady47; ExTexasRedhead; ...
"If not for McCain picking her as his running mate, she would still be the virtually unknown governor of Alaska."
BS !
It boggles my mind to see the strongest supporters of the ability and backbone of Sarah Palin unwittingly putting her DOWN by implying that without McCain selecting her as his running mate she would be a big nothing.
How is it that Governor Pawlenty and other names in the forefront for potential presidential nomination got into this position without being tapped as McNut's or anybody else's running mate in the past? Hmmmm?
It couldn't be that Gov. Pawlenty's ability, drive and conservative credentials brought him out of the nowhere-pack and took him into the presidential hopeful circle, could it? Did he need McCain or anyone else to do it?
Then, why isn't Sarah afforded this same acknowledgment and respect? Is she a no-talent woman who has only earned her way into the political major leagues because some no-talent senator raised her up and HE was the only way she escaped remaining "virtually unknown" forever?
Palin supporters should drop this mantra of her "owing" McCain because of their perception that HE single-handedly transformed her from sooty Cinderella to successful princess.
She doesn't "owe" McCain a damn thing. He owes HER for elevating him from the frog he is to a temporary prince during the presidential campaign.
Leni
53
posted on
02/22/2010 8:46:35 AM PST
by
MinuteGal
(Bill O'Reilly: 9/8/09: "Communism is not a threat to us anymore"-10/20/09: "Obama is not a Marxist")
To: stephenjohnbanker
McCain is Public Enemy # 1 to conservatism. Sarah should have stayed out of this altogether. If Haworth loses by one or two points, Sarah will be the sole reason, due to her popularity. For me? No sale!
You know SJB, there is another factor that I don't think has been considered by Sarah, or by those who support her, which is: IF Hayworth does unseat McCain as the GOP candidate for that Senate seat, despite Sarah's support for McCain, will that damage the perception of her vote getting ability? It's true that Hoffmann in New York didn't win despite Sarah's endorsement, but that was a House congressional race with mostly new faces, McCain is a Senatorial heavy-hitter, if he loses to Hayworth despite Sarah's support, I think it creates a whole new set of issues.
And IF Hayworth prevails in this primary challenge and McCain decides to emulate Joe Liebermann in Connecticut and run as an independent, will he be expecting Sarah to continue to support him AGAINST the GOP candidate? If she does, it will alienate the entire GOP base against her, be they conservative or be they RINO, if she doesn't, will she face charges of 'disloyalty' to McCain?
As many have said already (you being one of them), this is a lose-lose proposition. If I were advising Sarah, I would be telling her "find a reason to stay the Hell out of Arizona until after Labor Day, get sick, lose your voice, have a need for more family time, ANYthing!"
54
posted on
02/22/2010 8:54:28 AM PST
by
mkjessup
(How do you spell 'real conservative' in Arizona? J.D. Hayworth !! - Flush McStain down the Drain!!)
To: TheDailyChange
nOOb, its best you learn how to use the search function. This has been discussed over and over and over and over again. Of course, since you’re new, you will be looked at through a magnifying glass.
55
posted on
02/22/2010 8:56:32 AM PST
by
rintense
(Only dead fish go with the flow, which explains why Congress stinks.)
To: mkjessup
“And IF Hayworth prevails in this primary challenge and McCain decides to emulate Joe Liebermann in Connecticut and run as an independent, will he be expecting Sarah to continue to support him AGAINST the GOP candidate? If she does, it will alienate the entire GOP base against her, be they conservative or be they RINO, if she doesn’t, will she face charges of ‘disloyalty’ to McCain?”
I thought of this, but you put it more eloquently. I believe nothing is beneath McCain He would do this if he percieved the the backlash against him would be tolerable.
56
posted on
02/22/2010 9:05:12 AM PST
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Support our troops, and vote out the RINOS)
To: HospiceNurse
Think so? I don’t.
If McCain wins it won’t be because of Palin. It’ll be because Hayworth either got bad advice as to his chances or he somehow dropped the ball during the campaign.
Palin knows this. McCain knows this. Hayworth knows this. In the meantime, her loyalty adds another dimension to a picture that is, already, nearly perfect.
This isn’t a babe with a vacuum between her ears. She’s as wise as she is good looking.
57
posted on
02/22/2010 9:05:24 AM PST
by
IL1949
To: stephenjohnbanker
I brought this up a few weeks ago as well. McCain is just that spiteful to run as an independent or democrat.
In which case, I don't think Sarah would support him. She'd likely sit that race out. But if she did end up endorsing him as an independent/Dem, well, I just don't want to say. It would be NY-23 all over again. And she'd play the role of Newt this time.
58
posted on
02/22/2010 9:07:34 AM PST
by
rintense
(Only dead fish go with the flow, which explains why Congress stinks.)
To: TheDailyChange
Is this all about GRATITUDE? Yes. And you would do it too. It's basic human behavior, and we shouldn't be making a big deal about it. She was an unknown governor until McCain put her in the spotlight.
Because of her new prominence, she is a voice to be reckoned with. One tweet from her discombonulates the entire Democrat establishment. That would not have been possible without McCain's selection of her.
So, yes, it is gratitude, and there's nothing wrong with it. I hope that Hayworth beats McCain the potential Dem vice president candidate big time, but it won't be Palin's fault if he doesn't.
59
posted on
02/22/2010 9:13:54 AM PST
by
oldbill
To: rintense
This is why Sarah should have stayed out of the primary, and then backed the winner.
60
posted on
02/22/2010 9:20:57 AM PST
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Support our troops, and vote out the RINOS)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson