[rxsid]

Let's not forget that (at least) 1 lawsuit was filed prior to the DNC convention (let alone the election). Then, after he was only President-elect and prior to the E.C. votes were cast or counted in Congress...multiple lawsuits were filed againts him.

IMO, the reason this wasn't touched in 2008 or 2009 comes down to the touchy subject of race. It's not about the subject matter at hand. It's about the color of his skin and this country's history re: that.

NOBODY was going to "deny" the first "black" president (even though he's more white and arabic than black). Especially when he enjoyed high "approval" ratings. No way, no how.

Remember though, it took over 2 years for Nixon to be brought down by the cover-up.

So, who knows now that his poll numbers are in the toilet and the Tea Partier's are starting to affect Congressional races.

[Lurking Libertarian]

Let's not forget that (at least) 1 lawsuit was filed prior to the DNC convention (let alone the election). Then, after he was only President-elect and prior to the E.C. votes were cast or counted in Congress...multiple lawsuits were filed againts him.

But not by anyone entitled to bring a challenge under state election laws.

[Las Vegas Ron]

NOBODY was going to "deny" the first "black" president

Yep, reparations via electing a half black POTUS (not to mention a lot of white guilt)