Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

This MOTION appears to deal primarily with the "b.c." issue, and not the "NBC" issue.
1 posted on 02/19/2010 3:45:39 PM PST by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: LucyT; BP2; STARWISE; Red Steel; pissant; hoosiermama; null and void; Amityschild; Calpernia; ...
FYI -

"MOTION for Preliminary Injunction - Taitz v Obama (QW - DC district court)"

2 posted on 02/19/2010 3:46:39 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rxsid

Boy, that JD via correspondence school is glaringly obvious.


3 posted on 02/19/2010 3:48:02 PM PST by Wallop the Cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rxsid

Great, I’m in before the AFTER-birther trolls.


5 posted on 02/19/2010 3:49:53 PM PST by stockpirate (Hey Beck, Thomas Jefferson was a birther!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rxsid

Here is the basis of the motion:

I got myself sanctioned and am about to be disbarred. Therefore, Obama must turn over his birth certificate and financial aid records (seriously, why?), because that will somehow prevent me from being disbarred.


8 posted on 02/19/2010 3:52:24 PM PST by MrRobertPlant2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rxsid

I admit I haven’t been following this as closely as I should. So......what’s the over/under on this thing really going anywhere? I’m asking sincerely; no sarcasm here.


14 posted on 02/19/2010 4:00:14 PM PST by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rxsid
I only wish her well

I think a recusal motion is for jurists and a motion for withdrawl is for opposing counsel

I have little faith in the courts in this matter ... or for many others quite frankly

.

19 posted on 02/19/2010 4:11:49 PM PST by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rxsid
Who is Obama's birth doctor? Is that such a hard question for the President of the United States to answer?

1. Right now, I would just be satisfied with Obama coming out and announcing to all the world the name of his 1961 birth doctor so that the good doctor and his family can rightfully enjoy all the public glory and public rewards that a doctor who delivered a president of the united States should receive.

2. But surprisingly, dear old Obama has been conspicuously silent when it comes to publicly giving us his 1961 birth doctor's name.

3. Why is dear old Obama denying his 1961 birth doctor and his family all the public praise and rewards that a doctor who delivered the sitting President of the United States should be entitled to?

4. For instance, the doctor and his family could appear all over the television on such shows as Larry King, Hannity, O'Reilly, and Beck.

5. The good doctor could write a best-selling book about his experiences as a doctor at Kapiolani Hospital, the hospital where Obama says that he was born.

6. The good doctor could have a TV-movie made of his life, and he and his family could become rich and famous from books and movies.

7. The good doctor's family could have members who are important or not so important people today, people who could use the financial rewards and publicity that would come to them when Obama publicly announced the name of his 1961 Hawaii birth doctor.

8. But poor Obama, he is so silent about the name of his birth doctor.

9. So, again, why is the President of the United States behaving in such a terrible way and setting such a poor example to the people of the United States?

10. Could this be the reason: There is NO doctor name or hospital name on Obama's 1961 long form birth certificate?

11. Yes, that is the reason, in my opinion.

26 posted on 02/19/2010 4:19:17 PM PST by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rxsid
Has anybody been able to ask Obummer why he refuses to release these basic documents? You would figure the media would be just a little bit curious about his reasons for doing this. I don't think they would give Sarah Palin the same courtesy.
57 posted on 02/19/2010 5:14:38 PM PST by peeps36 (Democrats Don't Need No Stinking Input From You Little People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rxsid

Ping


60 posted on 02/19/2010 5:18:48 PM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rxsid

obumpa


111 posted on 02/19/2010 10:05:15 PM PST by Dajjal (Obama is an Ericksonian NLP hypnotist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mlo; Non-Sequitur; parsifal; Pilsner; Drew68; curiosity; Sibre Fan; El Sordo; MilspecRob; ...

Ping. Whack-a-mole and all that ...


116 posted on 02/20/2010 12:52:06 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson