Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: PeaRidge
Both documents say that they are there to NEGOTIATE!

Were they there to negotiate an end to secession?

617 posted on 03/01/2010 2:56:40 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 615 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
Smart guy “Both documents say that they are there to NEGOTIATE!”

Idiot “Were they there to negotiate an end to secession?”

Didn't you claim they needed “permission”? How does one gain permission -If party #2 will not NEGOTIATE?

Take your Lincoln, sprinkle some Chase, and shove it!

618 posted on 03/01/2010 3:16:36 PM PST by Idabilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 617 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur
So, it is abundantly clear that all documents state that they were there to negotiate.

You said: “They were not there to negotiate, the letter doesn't say they were there to negotiate.?

So, again, your statement is shown to be what it is....a total misrepresentation.

640 posted on 03/03/2010 2:35:47 PM PST by PeaRidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 617 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur
And Lincoln did not acknowledge any of the correspondence or the presence in Washington of the commissioners themselves.

It was obvious that he was not there to negotiate peace.

In fact, as the Peace Commissioners were attempting to present the greetings of the Confederacy, Lincoln was sending the Union Navy, secretly, to Charleston harbor.

He was proceeding with war, not peace.

641 posted on 03/03/2010 2:40:39 PM PST by PeaRidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 617 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson