You most certainly have, toad face.
It is you who claim there is a third way, unilateral secession without the consent of anyone.
Unilateral secession was a viable method on December 20, 1860 when the Great State of South Carolina unilaterally seceded.
Chase's 'opinion' didn't occur until 4 years after the end of the war, 9 years after the Great State of South Carolina unilaterally seceded and, of course, Chase was just a leetle bit biased being one of disHonest Abe's main boot lickers. Kinda like you, turd breath.
You've gone all puzzleheaded on us again, haven't you?
Unilateral secession was a viable method on December 20, 1860 when the Great State of South Carolina unilaterally seceded.
So the South thought. Turns out they were wrong.
Chase's 'opinion' didn't occur until 4 years after the end of the war, 9 years after the Great State of South Carolina unilaterally seceded...
Were you not aware that ALL court decisions take place after the fact?
... and, of course, Chase was just a leetle bit biased being one of disHonest Abe's main boot lickers.
So does that mean you're going to stop leaning on post-rebellion revisionist writings of the rebel leaders? On the grounds that they, too, might be just a leeetle bit biased?
Kinda like you, turd breath.
Acting all adult on us again, I see?