Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: M Kehoe
Maybe not a "clause," but seems to me the Lonestar state makes it pretty clear if certain rights are breached by the federal government, they can dissolve the relationship.

I would refer you to Article VI Clause 2 of the Constitution. Regardless of what Texas may think their constitution allows for, they may secede only if the U.S. Constitution provides for it, and only is such a manner as it legal under it.

Obviously, this question of law is not stare decisis, no matter what Scalia thinks.

I think I'll defer to Justice Scalia and his expertise over your's. No offense meant.

548 posted on 02/27/2010 11:47:55 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 547 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
I think I'll defer to Justice Scalia and his expertise over your's. No offense meant.

None taken. I'm not a jurist, and Justice Scalia is far more educated in the law than me. Having said that, I laid out an argument in post 544, that I challenge any legal scholar to dismiss out of hand. Further more, I hope I'm wrong, this type of case may one day make it to SCOTUS. If it does, all bets are off.

5.56mm

549 posted on 02/27/2010 12:56:30 PM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 548 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson