Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Idabilly
Jeff Davis to Federal Boot Kisser

"Federal Boot Kisser" to Idabooby:

Why did you stop there? Davis' next paragraph gives us an idea of Mississippi's motives.

"It has been a conviction of pressing necessity—it has been a belief that we are to be deprived in the Union of the rights which our fathers bequeathed to us—which has brought Mississippi to her present decision. She has heard proclaimed the theory that all men are created free and equal, and this made the basis of an attack upon her social institutions; and the sacred Declaration of Independence has been invoked to maintain the position of the equality of the races. That Declaration is to be construed by the circumstances and purposes for which it was made. The communities were declaring their independence; the people of those communities were asserting that no man was born—to use the language of Mr. Jefferson—booted and spurred, to ride over the rest of mankind; that men were created equal—meaning the men of the political community; that there was no divine right to rule; that no man inherited the right to govern; that there were no classes by which power and place descended to families; but that all stations were equally within the grasp of each member of the body politic. These were the great principles they announced; these were the purposes for which they made their declaration; these were the ends to which their enunciation was directed. They have no reference to the slave; else, how happened it that among the items of arraignment against George III was that he endeavored to do just what the North has been endeavoring of late to do, to stir up insurrection among our slaves? Had the Declaration announced that the negroes were free and equal, how was the prince to be arraigned for raising up insurrection among them? And how was this to be enumerated among the high crimes which caused the colonies to sever their connection with the mother-country? When our Constitution was formed, the same idea was rendered more palpable; for there we find provision made for that very class of persons as property; they were not put upon the equality of footing with white men—not even upon that of paupers and convicts; but, so far as representation was concerned, were discriminated against as a lower caste, only to be represented in the numerical proportion of three-fifths. So stands the compact which binds us together."

Sure looks to me like Davis' views towards blacks wasn't a whole lot different than what you say Lincoln's were. And you call him a racist. What does that make Jeffy boy?

437 posted on 02/25/2010 2:51:45 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 429 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur; Colonel Kangaroo
“Sure looks to me like Davis’ views towards blacks wasn't a whole lot different than what you say Lincoln's were. And you call him a racist. What does that make Jeffy boy?”

Then it would fall ,by default, to a State(s) Right to Secede, right?

Y'all have chosen - The point of view Admired by Adolf Hitler - Figures!

443 posted on 02/25/2010 3:27:49 PM PST by Idabilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson