Posted on 02/16/2010 10:37:04 AM PST by Corazon
Losing on procedure is the legal equivalent of losing a football game because you kept putting 12 players on the field, play after play after play... then you punted on 2nd down.... then you ran towards the wrong end zone... you get the idea.
I like how Orly brought scumbags like Charles Lincoln III and Lucas Smith onto her team and then asked surprised when they turned out to be scumbags.
“This convicted forgerer is telling lies about me!! But I still want you to treat his obviously fake birth certificate as reall.”
“I have a disbarred felon as my law clerk and it’s obvious that he does all my writing. And I had sex with him. And I helped him set up a mortgage scam. But he then tried to forge my signature!!!! Off with his head”
A scumbag is someone who puts words into another persons mouth as if it were a quote.
“New Times in Florida against Orly Taitz”
Orly Taitz is passionate. Too bad she is also one of the most incompetent lawyers to ever bear the title.
Is english your second language or were you suffering some kind of seizure when you were writing that post?
HA!
HA HA!
“Man, you write almost as well as Taitz produces legal docs.”
ROFLMAO!!!
That's why the January 12 hearing was called: for U.S. District Court Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow to determine whether to punish Lincoln for allegedly misleading the court.
and...
Taitz denied ever giving anyone permission to write her signature. Judge Snow seemed aghast that Lincoln, a former lawyer, would think it was all right to sign as someone other than himself — regardless of whether he had permission to do so. "I'm just baffled," she told Lincoln.
Are you even aware there is "page 2" to the story??
“And thats all yoiu have”
OMG! LMAO!!! Please....stop....can’t.....breathe....WAAAAAHHHAAAAAHHHAAAA!
but this also doesn’t mean she should be subject to electronic harassment everywhere else
Those are direct quotes that I just made up.
I may have to use that as my TagLine...and claim it as my own.
Orly had no case, she simply said the signature was not hers and it was found out that it was not hers.
That is not a ruling against Orly, when she is shown to be correct in court.
Amen. Especially when those quotes tend to confirm facts not in evidence and irrelevant to the question before the court. Most people don’t know defamation is mentioned in the Ten Commandments:
“Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.”
Read carefully. That’s not just simple lying. That’s deliberately attacking someone’s reputation via false information, speaking falsehoods *against* someone. It is a kind of “reputational murder,” and anonymous people hiding behind a pixilated screen can do it with abandon and get away with it. But not really. Those are God’s commandments, so I’m pretty sure he’s keeping score, even if we can’t.
Well, next time you talk to him, ask God why Orly submitted a likely faked document from a convicted forger as evidence and why she hired a disabarred attorney as her law clerk? (Those two facts are not in dispute).
Whether or not she had sex with the disbarred attorney is still an open question. But it has been entered into testimony in open court.
I haven’t seen the movie, but I have read the book. It’s just not good form to be careless about what we say that can harm another’s reputation, especially in sexual matters. It’s a golden rule thing. Besides, a little dispassionate caution concerning other people’s controversies can go a long way to getting at the truth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.