I’ll agree that our differences are based on our moral differences. I don’t agree that the decision to protect unalienable rights by society is not a moral issue.
The State legislature, our representative government, has determined the lottery is acceptable. That does not mean that we have to determine that casino gambling is acceptable.
For the Gardasil, my argument is all over this forum, and the (still long) synopsis is here,
http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=297887064231&1&index=1
The State legislature, our representative government, has determined the lottery is acceptable. That does not mean that we have to determine that casino gambling is acceptable.
For the Gardasil, my argument is all over this forum, and the (still long) synopsis is here, http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=297887064231&1&index=1
Our differences aren't moral; I'm in favor of liberty, protecting inalienable rights and limiting the role of government, you are when it suits you. You want "your version" of morality legislated, I don't want yours or anyone else's.
You completely avoided my point on Perry, the lottery and gambling. No surprise, your logic is flawed.
Depriving young girls of their rights in the name of science is wrong, period. And based on your logic, it's immoral. That you're doctor only makes it worse.