Then she clarified. Her questions were with regardss to the worthless 911 report, heavily redacted, mind you. The same report that did not address Able Danger in any serious manner and did not address the Gorelick Wall.
Her clarification was unsatisfactory. It was a political backpedal by a political campaign that had torpedoed itself. You’d have never bought such a “statement” by Van Jones ... why buy it from Medina?
And, she’s reiterated her “concerns” since the half-assed “statement” (see the ABC interview and various appearances on Alex Jones’s show). She’s a nut.
SnakeDoc
Her questions are not just in regards to the 9/11 Commission Report. She’s posed at least one debunked truther claim as a question which she believes is legitimate.
“In her news conference Friday, it is clear Medina was trying to clean up the mess. But in our interview with her hours after the Beck radio show, she repeated there are still questions that need to be answered. On Friday, she told reporters she is curious why no New York City police officers died in the towers when so many firefighters did. That’s not true, however, as 60 police officers were killed.”
http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/politics&id=7274692
Even if Glenn Beck did set her up, which I don’t believe, she’s still a truther. Repeating truther claims as true/legitimate makes one a truther.