Use your words. A huge cut and paste does not an argument make. Perhaps a comment regarding what point you were making?
Perhaps?
Typical libby remark - when you CANNOT back up your deluded position ... attack the opposition
You want my own words ??? Here goes ...
You hang your hat on ONE SCOTUS decision (Ark) and claim that it is the be-all and end-all ...
People show you other SCOTUS decisions that contradict your position - you dismiss them and you keep going back to Ark.
So, I take you up on it and show you that Calvin's Case (which Ark cited as the relevant English Common Law) declared that a natural born subject is born both within the sovreign's dominion AND under a SINGLE SOLITARY allegiance to that sovreign AND THAT SOVREIGN ONLY. And I even give you the relevent text by cut nd paste ...
Not only that, but you "cherry pick" from Blackstone that children born to aliens in Britain are "natural born subjects" (with the exception of foreign ambassador's children) to support it.
However, Blackstone had much more to say about "natural born subjects" - specifically "denizens", which can be children aliens born within Britain but with MORE THAN ONE allegiance and who ARE NOT natural born subjects ...
You would NEVER make it onto even an elementary school debate squad ...
"That Wiggy ... What a Maroon !!!