Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: EnderWiggins

You didn’t have to look again, nor is it likely that you did. The phrase ‘natural born citizen’ is a special phrase in that section of the Constitution, and must be interpreted as a special more exclusionary requirement than simple citizenship.

As you read it, as I understand, it loses all special meaning.


90 posted on 02/12/2010 2:19:05 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: bvw
"The phrase ‘natural born citizen’ is a special phrase in that section of the Constitution, "

No it's not.

It is a well known and well used term of English common law that goes back more than 300 years prior to the Constitution. And its meaning was always well know. Especially to the lawyers of the federal Convention (over half of the delegates).

"and must be interpreted as a special more exclusionary requirement than simple citizenship."

And it is. It excludes naturalized citizens.
98 posted on 02/12/2010 2:27:04 PM PST by EnderWiggins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson