Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: EnderWiggins

But Barack Hussein Obama was not and still is not under the sole jurisdiction of the United states, is he?

Title 8 and the 14th Amendment both state; All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

So explain how “not merely subjct in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction, and owing them direct and immediate allegiange.”

So to ‘what’ degree was Barack Hussein Obama under US Jurisdiction at birth? Knowing that he was already under British jurisdiction, and how that being only partial or to whatever degree you impose not being in conflict with “completely subject to”?

Mind you this is The Supreme Court that has stated complete and not partial to any degree jurisdiction.


394 posted on 02/13/2010 4:31:33 PM PST by syc1959
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies ]


To: syc1959
"But Barack Hussein Obama was not and still is not under the sole jurisdiction of the United states, is he?"

Ignoring that neither Title 8 nor the 14th Amendment say anything about "sole" jurisdiction, yes he is.

As is everybody physically present in the United States who is not a foreign diplomat or member of an occupying army.
399 posted on 02/13/2010 4:38:37 PM PST by EnderWiggins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson