[EnderWiggins]

"A simple question for you on born on US soil to anybody who is not a foriegn diplomat or occupying army..... Is that Supreme Court decision, the Law of the Land?

Currently, yes. Even the recent efforts to deny citizenship to anchor babies (such as the Birthright Citizenship Act of 2007 (HR 1940) acknowledge that this is currently the law, and that they are trying to change it.

[syc1959]

EnderWiggins

ANSWER THE SIMPLE QUESTIONS;

Title 8 and the 14th Amendment both state; All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

So explain how “not merely subjct in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction, and owing them direct and immediate allegiange.”

So to ‘what’ degree was Barack Hussein Obama under US Jurisdiction at birth? Knowing that he was already under British jurisdiction, and how that being only partial or to whatever degree you impose not being in conflict with “completely subject to”?

Mind you this is The Supreme Court that has stated complete and not partial to any degree jurisdiction.

[usmcobra]

WRONG!

The Supreme Court does not write Laws. It was a trick question, and you gave the standard liberal answer.