Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: EnderWiggins

WKA’s parents were under the jurisdiction of foreign law, it has been viewed as a flawed decision.
I have posted four other Supreme Court cases that directly conflict with WKA.

An Act of April 9, 1866 established for the first time a national law that read, “all persons born in the United States, and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed.” Rep. John A. Bingham, chief architect of the 14th Amendments first section, said this national law (Section 1992 of the US Revised Statutes) was “simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.”


286 posted on 02/12/2010 6:51:13 PM PST by syc1959
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies ]


To: syc1959
"WKA’s parents were under the jurisdiction of foreign law, it has been viewed as a flawed decision."

Only by Birthers.

"I have posted four other Supreme Court cases that directly conflict with WKA." Only in your fevered imagination. You do not display that you understand those cases at all, let alone that they contradict Wong Kim Ark. With the expedition of Dredd Scott perhaps, but at least you've been smart enough to not go there.

And since Bingham was speaking about 80 years too late, his opinion has no authority over the meaning of Article II.
292 posted on 02/12/2010 6:57:37 PM PST by EnderWiggins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson