Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: syc1959
"what is being born in Hawaii have to do with BaracK Hussein Obama being a British Subject, under British Law."

Absolutely nothing. There is no connection whatsoever between those two things.

"Barack Hussein Obama was and still is under the British Nationality Act of 1948, and as such no matter where he was born, he fails with any percent of foreign whatever fails as a ‘Natural Born Citizen’ as required by the United States Constitution."

Oh, darn. And you were doing so well.

The Constitution does not say that.
25 posted on 02/12/2010 1:11:19 PM PST by EnderWiggins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: EnderWiggins

Barack Hussein Obama regardless of where he was born, Kenya, Hawaii, the Washington Momument, is a British Subject, under British law, and as such fails as the United States Constitution requires only a “Natural Born Citizen” is eligilble for the Presidency.

How is a British subject a ‘Natural Born Citizen’ of the United States?

How is a ‘Natural Born Citizen’ of the United States governed by British Law?

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.

Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”

Considerations on the Nature and Extent of the Legislative Authority of the British Parliament, 1774.

Thus we see, that the subjects of the king, though they reside in foreign countries, still owe the duties of allegiance, and are still entitled to the advantages of it. They transmit to their posterity the privilege of naturalization, and all the other privileges which are the consequences of it.{q}

{q} Natural born subjects have a great variety of rights, which they acquire by being born in the king’s ligeance, and can never forfeit by any distance of place or time, but only by their own misbehaviour; the explanation of which rights is the principal subject of the law. 1. Bl. Com. 371.


32 posted on 02/12/2010 1:16:56 PM PST by syc1959
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: EnderWiggins
The Constitution does not say that.

What part of Article II Sec. 1 do you not understand?

34 posted on 02/12/2010 1:17:29 PM PST by Las Vegas Ron ("Because without America, there is no free world" - Canada Free Press - MSM where are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson