Posted on 02/11/2010 5:45:12 PM PST by malkee
For those of us that don’t watch the blowhard, care to toss another clue out there?
Huge disappointment. Glad O’Reily cut him loose. I think he was surprized because he was still talking when they cut to the next segment. What a putz, I thought he was anxious to get the truth out. It was a simple question....maybe he was afraid the Chicago mob would pay him a visit.
He'd definitely become a permanent member of the Press Corpse.
I watched the whole thing. O’Reilly was being a pushy idiot. Blago couldn’t answer the boneheaded question that BOR kept grilling him with for freakin’ OBVIOUS reasons....and BOR wouldn’t relent.
If I’ve ever seen a more blatant example of BOR being a pseudo-populist schmuch, I can’t think of it.
BTW....I’m certainly NO fan of Blago.
That was basically it. Anyone else can contribute anything else they gleaned from the conversation.
Why would Blago call for the release of all of the taped calls, if he was afraid?
BOW thinks his ^%$#@ don’t stink.......
BOW = Bill O Wuss......lololool
O’Reilly was definately not being his usual obnoxious self. He asked a legitimate question and expected an answer. O’Reilly held his ground and I thought he did a good job. Blago was dancing around. If Blago couldn’t even give an opinion as to what he thought about 0bama and Emmanuel being embarassed or not by what was on the tape then he shouldn’t have come on. What was the point? He wouldn’t answer anything.
Bet they had to throw sand on the floors to keep from slipping on the grease falling from that hair...
Why spill the beans - he’s waiting for his day in court.
O’Reilly was pissed that Blago kept ducking and weaving. In a later segment he teased Gretchen Carlson by calling her “Rod”. I just saw the tail end of the Blago segment but it looked like BOR was holding his feet to the fire.
Well tell ya what.....how about trying to actually think about it for two seconds or more.
You (Blago, in this case) are in the midst of a serious court case facing serious charges. BOR asks a purely speculative question that is guaranteed, if answered openly, to rain untold s**t onto your head in the midst of this trial.
Good God in His Heaven, get REAL. Sometimes people here just floor me......
The easy answer would have been “I don’t know. It depends how easily they are embarassed.”
He didn’t have to spill the beans, just a simple “Yes, I believe so”.
Why did he go on then?
“Why did he go on then?”
To keep his name and face ‘out there’ so he or his family won’t be sleeping with the fishes?
“He wouldn’t answer anything.”
I saw the whole segment. Blago was in “shock” when BOR asked him if the tapes would embarass Obama and Emmanuel. I think Blago knows better than to answer a question like that in public or on the air waves... a couple of phone calls from Rahm-bo and Blago’s family gets a “dead fish” delivered to their doorstep.
There should be some “discovery” about these tapes by Blago’s lawyers... nay?
Combat... I hadn’t seen your post but it seems we’re on the same page! See my Post #19.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.