Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/11/2010 10:28:23 AM PST by publius321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: publius321

O’Really owns nothing.

except his own smarminess


2 posted on 02/11/2010 10:34:35 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. Chuck DeVore - CA Senator. Believe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: publius321
I just heard Rush talking about how Bill O’Reilly owns the rights to the term “the folks”. . . That along with another term media pundits like to use “everyday people” seem so condescending.

Beware of anyone who uses the term 'masses' . . . seriously.

3 posted on 02/11/2010 10:35:12 AM PST by Oratam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: publius321

I have to agree. I said on another thread several days ago that if I hear BOR say “the folks” one more time I’d scream bloody murder.

It IS condescending, not to mention annoying as hell.


4 posted on 02/11/2010 10:35:42 AM PST by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: publius321
0′pinhead is just an…”announcer” … Just as all those million +$ football players are just… “jocks”…
5 posted on 02/11/2010 10:37:58 AM PST by gunnyg (Laddies, We're Behind Enemy Within Lines...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: publius321
I have been watching O’Reilly since 1998 (though much less lately)
Me too - much, much, much, much less.
His pandering to 0bama is sickening and he continues to showcase that racist Marc Lamont. Baaaaaaarf.
6 posted on 02/11/2010 10:45:53 AM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: publius321

I think some folks are getting unnecessarily stirred up over the use of the word, “folks”. I use that word often and have never thought of it as being condescending in any way, shape or form.


7 posted on 02/11/2010 10:47:22 AM PST by CaribouCrossing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: publius321

Last week, O’Reilly stated that he “just can’t put his finger on what exactly the “teaparty movement” is. I just laughed. Hey, O’Reilly, it’s “the folks”, ya know, the people you say you are always “lookin out for”.


9 posted on 02/11/2010 10:54:32 AM PST by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: publius321

I doubt if O’Reilly stole anything from Mark Levin, since O’Reilly is too ignorant to know who Levin is. I have noticed O’reilly leaning more and more left, probably in reaction to the MSM calling him “conservative”, which he never was. Frankly, I don’t think O’reilly is bright enough to have any political principles, even liberalism. He seems to view everything through a prism of some kind of 1950’s suburban Catholisism, which he probably developed in his youth and never grew out of. Ever notice how many outdated words and phrases he used in his normal speech?


10 posted on 02/11/2010 11:30:19 AM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: publius321

So Mark Levin owns the word, ‘go’?


11 posted on 02/11/2010 11:45:05 AM PST by sportutegrl (VETO PROOF MAJORITY IN 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: publius321

How many media pundits can dance on the head of a pin?


12 posted on 02/11/2010 11:46:38 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson