Think about it this way, if the Judge did not order the Rejection, it would have been up to Fiat SOLELY whether or not dealers lost their franchises, and which ones. Some of those dealers had SUCCESSFULLY been in business since the 1920’s!!!!!!!!!!
Dealerships handed down from father to son over decades.
Why would the Judge order this, when NO ONE party to the sale requested it?
A phone call in the night perhaps? Because the Footnote 21 takes legal sworn testimony OUT OF CONTEXT, and that is FRAUD. Gonzalez had the opportunity to correct the “error” if indeed that is what it was with this Motion, but he denied it. And golly look at this... he’s a chief justice now... isn’t that just a coinkidink?
I think not.
Weren’t those dealership singled out based on to whom they gave their money to (elections, etc.)???