Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Maelstorm
Is there any truth to the following comments?

"Rand Paul has expressed opposition to the Patriot Act, has supported the cutting of military spending, has endorsed the shutting down of GITMO and has called for the banning of harsh interrogation of Muslim terrorists."

10 posted on 02/02/2010 10:11:27 PM PST by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Victoria Delsoul
He is opposed to the Patriot Act.

His position is that national defense is the primary role of the federal government so he wouldn't support defense cuts, at least not drastic ones.

He does not support closing Gitmo, but rather using it to hold convicted terrorists. He has said that those deemed innocent or those for whom we have no evidence to try should be released.

I'm not certain about the last point.
12 posted on 02/02/2010 10:18:53 PM PST by Rodebrecht (No army can stop an idea whose time has come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Victoria Delsoul

Rand Paul: Try, Convict and Lock Up Terrorists In Guantanamo

Published on 19 November 2009 by admin in General News

November 19, 2009

BOWLING GREEN, KENTUCKY – Leading United States Senate candidate Rand Paul today criticized the Obama administration’s decision to close the Guantanamo Bay detention center and try terrorism suspects in United States Civil Courts.

“Foreign terrorists do not deserve the protections of our Constitution,” said Dr. Paul. “These thugs should stand before military tribunals and be kept off American soil. I will always fight to keep Kentucky safe and that starts with cracking down on our enemies.”

Dr. Paul believes in strong national defense and thinks military spending should be our country’s top budget priority.


13 posted on 02/02/2010 10:20:09 PM PST by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Victoria Delsoul

Rand Paul has expressed opposition to parts of the patriot act. I think his concerns are resonable.

http://www.randpaul2010.com/issues/a-g/guns-politicians/
Rand Paul had this to say about Guantanamo Bay:

“Foreign terrorists do not deserve the protections of our Constitution,” said Dr. Paul. “These thugs should stand before military tribunals and be kept off American soil. I will always fight to keep Kentucky safe and that starts with cracking down on our enemies.”

He doesn’t support ‘torture’ or enhanced interrogation. I part ways with him on that but unlike our liberal friends he isn’t about assigning terrorists lawyers and sending them to NY. He is a constitutionalist and we need more of those.

Check for yourself. I’m more scared of radical socialist liberals and milktoast Republicans than anything Rand Paul believes.

http://www.randpaul2010.com/issues/


16 posted on 02/02/2010 10:22:34 PM PST by Maelstorm (We are umbilicaled to a parasitic beast that feeds off one man so to enslave another to dependency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Victoria Delsoul
Is there any truth to the following comments?
"Rand Paul has expressed opposition to the Patriot Act, has supported the cutting of military spending, has endorsed the shutting down of GITMO and has called for the banning of harsh interrogation of Muslim terrorists."

Yes, Rand Paul has repeated the same Al Qaeda type things that his father has said. However, in recent weeks Rand has walked back some of these more outrageous comments.

27 posted on 02/02/2010 11:51:42 PM PST by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson