[GodfearingTexan]

hmmm. well, i guess if you have time to be concerned about this, then go ahead. this is way off my care radar.

[proudpapa]

No...I just figure she’s trying to pick up the support of some of the Ron Paul supporters from 2008.

[Rodebrecht]

How does supporting cutting off foreign aid to Israel amount to anti-Semitism? By the logic, because Paul also supports cutting foreign aid to Arab nations he must be an anti-Arabist, and because he wants to cut foreign aid to sub-Saharan Africa he must be a racist.

I'd like to see the part of the Constitution which authorizes the Federal government to send the American peoples' tax dollars to any foreign government. It doesn't exist.

[Maelstorm]

I support Rand Paul. He is a great candidate and unlike his father isn’t as nutty. He isn’t anti-Israel as has been suggested in attempted smears against him. He’d be a refreshing conservative Senator. Trey Grayson on the other hand is a bad example of a recovering Democrat.

[Engineer_Soldier]

I don’t get why everybody is against the Pauls! This family is the most small-government, conservative, everything-we-all-believe-in (that the GOP doesn’t really espouse) of any in politics out there. If Ron Paul ran for president again (after being $h!t on by freepers and the establishment Romney/Guiliani/McCain bots alike), I would throw my vote and money at him like a chick does her panties at a Eminem concert in a heartbeat. Good for Sarah and her endorsement! It shows true character.

[piytar]

Nope. Rand is not his father. Appears (after BRIEF research) to be a good conservative. He does appear to be trying not to alienate the Paulian base too much, with some success, but he seems to be pretty solid.

[Engineer_Soldier]

Ron Paul, wants to end all foreign aid to Israel and see the United States sever its alliance with Israel.

It was our FOUNDING FATHERS that said something to the effect of, "Alliance with none, commerce with all." It's time we Constitutionalists get back to the founders' intent before it's all lost in confusion.

[ChrisInAR]

We should be thrilled about it. Shout it from the rooftops! Let the Neocons in the Senate go back to the home states & join the Democratic Party where they belong.

[Paladin2]

No,we should be concerned about the endorsement of the chief JUANnabie.

[familyop]

Rand Paul was for the terrorists before he was against them. ...said that he’d send them home instead of holding them. “It’d take ‘em a while to get back over here.” —Rand Paul

Rand Paul on Guantanamo Bay
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4dm7MG_fYk

[theanchoragedailyruse]

Sarah Palin should be concerned about her endorsement...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76lb9kAbXr4

Rand Paul: Against the War in Iraq

Rand Paul: Miltary budget makes up 40% of the federal budget

Hmmmm where did he get that from? http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_percentage_of_the_federal_budget_is_spent_on_the_military

“...That depends on who you ask. The liberal anti-war groups put it at “over 40%.” The federal government puts military spending as 17-20% of the budget. Creative accounting practices can skew the numbers to make just about any case one desires.”

[sten]

as long as she endorses any and all non-PROGRESSIVES.... it’d be better than what we’ve had for 20 years

[familyop]

What George Washington really said in his farewell address:

"Why, by interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humor or caprice?"

So we have no business brown-nosing the neo-Nazi Euro-peons and their Ayrab/Amalekite friends by helping them to oppose Israel. Iran needs a good nukin'!

[fieldmarshaldj]

Dangerously bad endorsement.

[NeoCaveman]

I know some people are concerned that he doesn’t support incredibly expensive nation building that never ends and an ever expanding surveillance state at home but don’t worry in two years we will be so broke that no one will be supporting those things.